首页> 外文期刊>International Orthopaedics >Lumbar discherniation: long-term outcomes after mini-open discectomy
【24h】

Lumbar discherniation: long-term outcomes after mini-open discectomy

机译:腰椎脱位:迷你开放椎间盘切除术后的长期结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PurposeThe outcomes of mini open discectomy in lumbar disc herniation are usually satisfying. Our study aims at finding if its results are still good at long-term follow-up.MethodsWe reviewed 552 patients operated between 1993 and 2013 by mini open discectomy procedure. Our main evaluation criterion is a modified Stauffer and Coventry classification applied during follow-up visits at threemonths, one year, fiveyears, and every fiveyears. The secondary criterion was the Oswestry Disability Index.ResultsThe outcomes are considered good to very good in 87.3% of the cases at oneyear follow-up. These results deteriorate after an average follow-up of 14.7years but remain satisfactory with 63.7%. The global decrease is 23.6%. The Oswestry Score decreases by 35 points at the same follow-up. In addition, 6.52% of patients required fusion at first revision and 1.08% at second revision. We also noticed 51 (9.2%) post-operative recurrences at the same level. In 23 (4.16%) of them, we proceeded to anew discectomy in an average interval of 41.4months. At an adjacent level, 29 patients (5.2%) presented a new symptomatic disc herniation; among them, eight cases (1.44%) needed discectomy. The re-operative rate (including recurrent disc herniation and fusion for degenerative indications) is 10.68% at the last follow-up.ConclusionsNearly 2/3 of our patient series keep satisfactory outcomes after about 15-year follow-up. The mini open discectomy remains a reliable surgical technique provided we respect the indications and surgical requirements. This procedure also avoids excessive instrumentation and its possible iatrogenic complications. Powerful randomized and controlled trials are needed to strengthen these deductions.
机译:腰椎间盘突出症中迷你开放椎间盘突出术的用途通常是令人满意的。我们的研究旨在找到它的结果仍然擅长长期后续的.Thodswe通过Mini Open Discentomy程序审查了1993年至2013年之间的552名患者。我们的主要评估标准是在临时宣传,一年,五年次和每五年的后续访问期间适用的改进的Stauffer和Coventry分类。二次标准是oswestry残疾指数。结果在onyear随访的87.3%的病例中被认为是非常好的。这些结果在平均随访14.7岁以下后劣化,但仍令人满意,63.7%。全球下降23.6%。 oswestry得分在相同的后续行动中减少了35分。此外,6.52%的患者在第一次修订时需要融合,第二次修订版1.08%。我们还注意到了同一水平的51(9.2%)的术后复发。在23(4.16%)中,我们以41.4个月的平均间隔进行重组椎间盘切除术。在相邻的水平,29名患者(5.2%)呈现出一种新的症状椎间盘突出;其中,八种病例(1.44%)需要椎间切除术。重新操作率(包括复发性椎间盘突出症和退行性指示的融合)在最后一次随访时为10.68%。结论我们的患者系列的2/3,在大约15年后的后续行动后保持令人满意的结果。提供迷你开放式椎间盘切除术仍然是一种可靠的手术技术,提供了尊重指示和手术要求。该程序还避免了过度仪器及其可能的原子病复杂性。需要强大的随机和受控试验来加强这些扣除。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号