...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of rheumatic diseases >Reliability of Box and Block Test for manual dexterity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study
【24h】

Reliability of Box and Block Test for manual dexterity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study

机译:类风湿性关节炎患者手动灵活的盒子和块试验的可靠性:试验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Objective This study is aimed to determine the reliability of the Box and Block (B&B) Test for manual dexterity of upper extremity function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis ( RA ) and to compare the results with age‐ and sex‐matched healthy controls, and also with available normative data. Methods The reliability of B&B Test was assessed within and between testers using the intraclass correlation coefficient ( ICC ) in patients with RA attending rheumatology clinics of Christian Medical College Hospital, India. The dexterity scores of patients were then compared with age‐ and sex‐matched controls and the Mathiowetz's population‐based normative data by Student's independent t ‐test. Results The interrater and intrarater reliability of the B&B Test in patients with RA ( n ?=?60) ranged from 0.92 to 0.97 and 0.91 to 0.95, respectively. The dexterity scores in patients with RA were lower as compared to the control group (dominant hand 54.87 vs . 68.18, P ??0.001; contralateral hand 52.65 vs . 65.6, P ??0.001) and population‐based normative score (dominant hand 54.87 vs . 80.02, P ??0.001; contralateral hand 52.65 vs . 77.23; P ??0.001). The control group scores were also lower than the normative data. Higher age of patient, longer disease duration and higher disease activity reflected by Disease Activity Score of 28 joints ( DAS ‐28) also correlated well with lower dexterity score. Conclusions The B&B Test is a reliable tool for assessing upper extremity function in patients with RA and the?dexterity scores are lower for RA patients. The scores had correlation with age, disease duration and disease activity.
机译:摘要目的本研究旨在确定盒子和块(B& b)试验的盒子和块(B& b)试验,用于对类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者的上肢功能的手动灵活性,并与年龄和性别匹配的健康对照结果进行比较,还有可用的规范数据。方法采用RA患者在基督教医学院医院,印度Christian Medical Collegy医院的风湿病学诊所,评估B& B检验的可靠性。然后将患者的灵活性分数与学生独立的T -Test的年龄和性别匹配的控件和Mathiowetz的人口的规范数据进行比较。结果RA(n = =Δ60)的患者中B&amp的Interriter和Interrarent可靠性分别为0.92至0.97和0.91至0.95。与对照组相比,RA患者的灵敏度得分(优势手54.87 vs。68.18,p?0.001;对侧手52.65 vs.65.6,p≤x0.001)和基于人口的规范分数(主导手54.87 vs。80.02,p?0.001;对侧手52.65 vs。77.23; p?0.001)。对照组分数也低于规范数据。患者的较高年龄,患者持续时间和更高的疾病活动反映在28个关节(DAS -28)的疾病活动评分中反映出来,较低的灵活性得分也很好地相关。结论B& B试验是一种可靠的工具,用于评估RA患者的上肢功能,而RA患者的灵活性评分较低。该评分与年龄,疾病持续时间和疾病活动具有相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号