首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Sensor Networks >Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.15.6-based WBANs under co-channel interference
【24h】

Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.15.6-based WBANs under co-channel interference

机译:基于IEEE 802.15.6的共同信道干扰性能评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, interference mitigation and coexistence strategies proposed in IEEE 802.15.6 standard are investigated within the context of co-channel interference. A comparative evaluation of the reference scenario (which does not use any coexistence scheme), two non-collaborative (i.e., time shared, random channel) and one implicitly collaborative (i.e., CSMA/CA) based coexistence schemes is presented for five co-located bodies. Extensive set of physical, medium access control (MAC) parameters are invoked to realise a comprehensive study with enhanced IEEE 802.15.6 proposed channel models. It is concluded that there is trade-off between coexistence schemes. For example, time shared and random channel provides much better packet reception ratio (PRR) and energy efficiency, though they suffer in meeting the delay constraints of the IEEE 802.15.6 standard. Whereas, CSMA/CA based implicit collaborative approach is able to achieve the delay requirements however, it does not perform well both in terms of PRR and energy consumption.
机译:在本文中,在共同信道干扰的背景下调查了IEEE 802.15.6标准中提出的干扰缓解和共存策略。参考场景(不使用任何共存方案)的比较评估,两个共同共同的共同协作(即,CSMA / CA)的两个非协作(即,时间共享,随机通道)和一个基于共同协作(即,CSMA / CA)的共享方案。定位的身体。调用广泛的物理,媒体访问控制(MAC)参数,以实现具有增强IEEE 802.15.6提出的频道模型的全面研究。得出结论,共存计划之间存在权衡。例如,时间共享和随机通道提供了更好的分组接收比(PRR)和能量效率,尽管它们会满足IEEE 802.15.6标准的延迟约束。然而,基于CSMA / CA的隐式协作方法能够实现延迟要求,但它在PRR和能量消耗方面都没有顺利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号