首页> 外文期刊>International journal of osteoarchaeology >The history of chicken and other bird exploitation in Thailand: Preliminary analysis of bird remains from four archaeological sites
【24h】

The history of chicken and other bird exploitation in Thailand: Preliminary analysis of bird remains from four archaeological sites

机译:泰国的鸡肉和其他鸟类剥削的历史:鸟类的初步分析来自四个考古遗址

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The origin of the domestication of chicken Gallus gallus domesticus is still a subject of debate. It principally originates from the red junglefowl G. gallus, which is distributed throughout Southeast Asia and South China. However, the prehistoric exploitation of chicken and red junglefowl in Southeast Asia has remained unclear due to a small number of samples for bone analysis. In this study, we analysed bird remains from four archaeological sites in Thailand: Ban Hua Ud (4,000-3,000 bp), Long Long Rak (1,900-1,600 bp), Ban Non Wat (3,750-1,500 bp), and Keed Kin (fifth-11th Century A.D.). Bones from pheasants/fowls (Phasianidae), storks (Ciconiidae), cormorants (Phalacrocoracidae), crows (Corvidae), and passerines (Passeriformes) were found. A small number of stork bones were found at three lowland sites, with none found at Long Long Rak. Cormorant bones were dominant at Ban Hua Ud but were only found at that site. Pheasant/fowl bones were found at all sites except Ban Hua Ud and dominated the number of identified specimens, suggesting that they were the most commonly used bird, at least after the Iron Age. Morphological bone identification criteria for the 24 Phasianidae species in Thailand have not been established; ancient DNA analysis is required to differentiate chicken/red junglefowl bone from other indigenous pheasants/fowls. It is obvious that mitochondrial DNA remained unchanged in the early stages of the domestication process. Further studies combining ancient DNA and morphological analyses are required to judge whether all of the candidate chicken bones are indeed from red junglefowl or chicken. Although these results are regionally and temporally restricted, they give important quantitative information on bird exploitation during the Neolithic and early historic Dvaravadi periods in Thailand.
机译:鸡巨大巨大巨大驯化的起源仍然是辩论的主题。它主要来自红色junglefowl G. Gallus,它分布在各地的东南亚和华南。然而,由于较数骨分析样品,养鸡和红丛林猎犬的捕鱼和红色丛林犯规仍然不明确。在这项研究中,我们分析了泰国四个考古地点的鸟类:Ban Hua UD(4,000-3,000 BP),长长的Rak(1,900-1,600 BP),禁止非Wat(3,750-1,500 BP),持久的亲属(第五-11世纪广告)。发现来自野鸡/家禽(phasianidae),鹳(ciconiidae),鸬鹚(鸬鹚),乌鸦(corvidae)和旁角(passeriformes)。在三个低地地点发现了少量的鹳骨骼,没有在长长的Rak中找到。鸬鹚骨头在Ban Hua UD占主导地位,但仅在该网站上发现。除Ban Hua UD以外的所有网站上都发现了野鸡/家禽骨骼,并占据了所识别的标本的数量,这表明它们是最常用的鸟,至少在铁时代之后。泰国24种嗜期磷脂种类的形态骨识别标准尚未建立;需要古代DNA分析来将鸡/红色丛林从其他土着野鸡/家禽分化。很明显,在驯化过程的早期阶段,线粒体DNA保持不变。结合古代DNA和形态学分析的进一步研究是需要判断所有候选鸡骨骼是否确实来自红色丛林束或鸡肉。虽然这些结果在区域和时间上受到限制,但它们在泰国新石器时代和早期历史的DVARAVADI期间提供了关于鸟类剥削的重要定量信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号