首页> 外文期刊>International journal of play therapy >Using Bookmarks: An Approach to Support Ethical Decision Making in Play Therapy
【24h】

Using Bookmarks: An Approach to Support Ethical Decision Making in Play Therapy

机译:使用书签:一种支持游戏疗法伦理决策的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Play therapy can be an effective intervention mode with children and families in counseling. As with any counseling intervention, ethical issues arise. This article examines 7 common ethical issues found in counseling that are particularly relevant to play therapy, presents a bookmark as a way to succinctly identify a decision-making model, and then applies the information to a hypothetical case. Play therapy is an effective way to facilitate children's expression in counseling (Landreth, 2012). Research suggests that using play results in benefits in areas such as academic achievement and literacy; learning; self-enhancement; relationship skill; and mental and physical health (Belknap & Hazier, 2014; Blanco & Ray, 2011). Even with the benefits of play therapy as an intervention, "little has been written about ethical issues faced by those providing play therapy" (Seymour & Rubin, 2006, p. 101). Play therapy can be complicated with ethical challenges. These challenges often include ethical uncertainties such as conflicting values and priorities, addressing counselor incompetence, maintaining confidentiality while respecting, balancing ethical codes with conflicting legal mandates, and addressing community standards that may differ from personal and professional ethics (Calley, 2009; Flynn & Black, 2011; Guterman & Rudes, 2008). Further confounding these ethical issues are factors such as agency and managed care billing expectations, the state of the economy, and businesses' need to make money (Calley, 2009; Lawson & Venart, 2005).
机译:游戏疗法可以是一个有效的干预模式,儿童和家庭在咨询。与任何咨询干预一样,出现道德问题。本文审查了咨询中发现的7个常见的道德问题,这些咨询尤其相关与游戏治疗相关,将书签作为一种简洁识别决策模型的方式,然后将信息应用于假设的情况。游戏疗法是促进儿童在咨询中的表达(Landreth,2012)的有效方法。研究表明,在学术成就和识字等领域使用效益的效益;学习;自我增强;关系技巧;和心理健康(Belknap&Hazier,2014; Blanco&Ray,2011)。即使在游戏疗法作为干预的好处,“小小的是关于提供游戏疗法的道德问题”(Seymour&Rubin,2006,第101页)。游戏疗法可能与道德挑战复杂化。这些挑战往往包括伦理的不确定性,如相互冲突的价值和优先事项,解决顾问的无能,维护机密性,同时尊重,平衡具有相互冲突的法律任务的道德规范,以及解决可能与个人和职业道德的社区标准(Calley,2009; Flynn和Black) ,2011; Guterman&Rudes,2008)。进一步混淆这些道德问题是原子能机构和管理护理费用,经济状况,经济状况和企业需要赚钱的因素(Calley,2009; Lawson&Venart,2005)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号