...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Mechanical Sciences >A comparative study of two constitutive models within an inverse approach to determine the spatial stiffness distribution in soft materials
【24h】

A comparative study of two constitutive models within an inverse approach to determine the spatial stiffness distribution in soft materials

机译:两种组成型模型在逆方法中确定软材料中空间刚度分布的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A comparative study is presented to solve the inverse problem in elasticity for the shear modulus (stiffness) distribution utilizing two constitutive equations: (1) linear elasticity assuming small strain theory, and (2) finite elasticity with a hyperelastic neo-Hookean material model. Assuming that a material undergoes large deformations and material nonlinearity is assumed negligible, the inverse solution using (2) is anticipated to yield better results than (1). Given the fact that solving a linear elastic model is significantly faster than a nonlinear model and more robust numerically, we posed the following question: How accurately could we map the shear modulus distribution with a linear elastic model using small strain theory for a specimen undergoing large deformations? To this end, experimental displacement data of a silicone composite sample containing two stiff inclusions of different sizes under uniaxial displacement controlled extension were acquired using a digital image correlation system. The silicone based composite was modeled both as a linear elastic solid under infinitesimal strains and as a neo-Hookean hyperelastic solid that takes into account geometrically nonlinear finite deformations. We observed that the mapped shear modulus contrast, determined by solving an inverse problem, between inclusion and background was higher for the linear elastic model as compared to that of the hyperelastic one. A similar trend was observed for simulated experiments, where synthetically computed displacement data were produced and the inverse problem solved using both, the linear elastic model and the neo-Hookean material model. In addition, it was observed that the inverse problem solution was inclusion size-sensitive, Consequently, an 1-D model was introduced to broaden our understanding of this issue. This 1-D analysis revealed that by using a linear elastic approach, the overestimation of the shear modulus contrast between inclusion and background increases with the increase of external loads and target shear modulus contrast. Finally, this investigation provides valuable information on the validity of the assumption for utilizing linear elasticity in solving inverse problems for the spatial distribution of shear modulus associated with soft solids undergoing large deformations. Thus, this work could be of importance to characterize mechanical property variations of polymer based materials such as rubbers or in elasticity imaging of tissues for pathology. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:提出了一种比较研究以解决利用两个组成型方程的剪切模量(刚度)分布的弹性中的逆问题:(1)具有小应变理论的线性弹性,(2)具有超弹性新卷起材料模型的有限弹性。假设一种材料经历大变形和材料非线性,假设假设可以忽略不计,预计使用(2)的反相溶液比(1)产生更好的结果。鉴于求解线性弹性模型比非线性模型和更稳健更快地进行了数字,我们提出了以下问题:我们如何使用小型应变理论对遭受的样品进行线性弹性模型来映射剪切模量分布变形?为此,利用数字图像相关系统获取含有在单轴位移控制延伸下含有两个不同尺寸的不同尺寸夹杂物的硅氧烷复合样品的实验位移数据。硅氧烷基复合材料在无限菌株下以线性弹性固体进行模拟,并且作为新速轴的超弹性固体,考虑到几何非线性有限变形。我们观察到通过求解逆问题确定的映射剪切模量对比度,与超弹性的模型相比,线性弹性模型之间的夹杂物和背景之间较高。对于模拟实验,观察到类似的趋势,其中产生了合成计算的位移数据,并且使用线性弹性模型和新妓间模型解决了逆问题。此外,观察到逆问题解决方案是包含大小敏感的,因此引入了1-D模型以扩大我们对此问题的理解。该1-D分析显示,通过使用线性弹性方法,随着外部负载和目标剪切模量对比度的增加,剪切模量与夹持和背景之间的对比度的高估增加。最后,该研究提供了有关用于利用线性弹性的假设的有效性的有价值的信息,以解决与正在进行大变形的软固体相关的剪切模量的空间分布的逆问题。因此,该作品可以重视表征基于聚合物基材料的机械性能变化,例如橡胶或组织组织的弹性成像。 (c)2018年elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号