...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of legal medicine >What are the differences in injury patterns of young and elderly traffic accident fatalities considering death on scene and death in hospital?
【24h】

What are the differences in injury patterns of young and elderly traffic accident fatalities considering death on scene and death in hospital?

机译:考虑医院死亡和死亡的年轻和老年交通事故死亡伤害模式的差异是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Older traffic participants have higher risks of injury than the population up to 65 years in case of comparable road traffic accidents and further, higher mortality rates at comparable injury severities. Rib fractures as risk factors are currently discussed. However, death on scene is associated with hardly survivable injuries and might not be a matter of neither rib fractures nor age. As 60% of traffic accident fatalities are estimated to die on scene, they are not captured in hospital-based trauma registries and injury patterns remain unknown. Our database comprises 309 road traffic fatalities, autopsied at the Institute of Legal Medicine Munich in 2004 and 2005. Injuries are coded according to Abbreviated Injury Scale, AISA (c) 2005 update 2008 [1]. Data used for this analysis are age, sex, site of death, site of accident, traffic participation mode, measures of injury severity, and rib fractures. The injury patterns of elderly, aged 65+ years, are compared to the younger ones divided by their site of death. Elderly with death on scene more often show serious thorax injuries and pelvic fractures than the younger. Some hints point towards older fatalities showing less frequently serious abdominal injuries. In hospital, elderly fatalities show lower Injury Severity Scores (ISSs) compared to the younger. The number of rib fractures is significantly higher for the elderly but is not the reason for death. Results show that young and old fatalities have different injury patterns and reveal first hints towards the need to analyze death on scene more in-depth.
机译:在可比较的道路交通事故和进一步的道路交通事故中,比65年的人口更高,较大的交通参与者的伤害风险具有更高的伤害风险,并且在可比较的伤害严重程度下的死亡率更高。目前讨论了肋骨骨折作为风险因素。然而,现场死亡与难以活力的伤害有关,可能不是肋骨骨折也不是年龄的问题。由于60%的交通事故死亡估计在现场死亡,他们不会在基于医院的创伤登记处捕获,并且伤害模式仍然未知。我们的数据库包括309条道路交通致命,在2004年和2005年在法律医学研究所尸检尸检。根据缩写伤害规模,AISA(C)2005年更新2008 [1]造成伤害。用于该分析的数据是年龄,性别,死亡现场,事故现场,交通参与模式,伤害措施严重程度,肋骨骨折。 65岁以上的老年人的伤害模式与年轻人除以他们的死亡现场相比。老年人死于现场,更常常显示严重的胸部伤害和骨盆骨折比年轻人更高。一些提示指向老年人的死亡点显示出不太严重的腹部伤害。在医院,老年人死亡率显示较年轻的伤害严重程度(ISSS)。老年人的肋骨骨折的数量显着高,但不是死亡的原因。结果表明,年轻人和老年人的死亡人口有不同的伤害模式,并揭示了对现场更深入地分析死亡的第一次提示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号