...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of legal medicine >Age estimation in forensic anthropology: methodological considerations about the validation studies of prediction models
【24h】

Age estimation in forensic anthropology: methodological considerations about the validation studies of prediction models

机译:法医人类学年龄估计:关于预测模型验证研究的方法论考虑因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

There is currently no clear consensus on how to calculate, express, and interpret the error when validating methods for age estimation in forensic anthropology. For this reason, it is likely that researchers are commonly drawing erroneous or confusing conclusions about the existence of population differences or the need to design new and increasingly complex estimation methods. In recent years, many researchers have highlighted these limitations. They propose new lines of research focused on the use of rigorous statistics and new technologies for the development of methods for estimating age. Our main objective in this study is to contribute to the strengthening of these novel ideas, for which we show the existing empirical evidence about the inadequacy of some age estimation methods in calculating, expressing, and interpreting the errors obtained. With this aim, a total of 500 simulations have been performed, in which hypothetical research teams develop and validate methods for age estimation. The data employed in this study was obtained from the "Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Growth Charts: United States" released in 2000. The charts relate age with height, weight, and head circumference of US male children. Five learning algorithms have been employed as age estimators. We have performed three experiments in which the following aspects have been analyzed: frequency with which "negative" results can be obtained in the validation studies; which are the most appropriate criteria to compare and select the age estimation methods; and what analysis should be employed to carry out the validation studies. The results show possible errors in the interpretation of validation studies as a consequence of the confusion of statistical concepts. To conclude, we made a proposal of "good practices" for the correct calculation, expression, and interpretation of the error when validating age estimation methods in forensic anthropology.
机译:目前没有明确的共识,关于如何计算,表达和解释验证法医人类学年龄估计方法时的错误。出于这个原因,研究人员很可能是普遍绘制有关人口差异存在的错误或混乱的结论或设计新的和越来越复杂的估计方法的需要。近年来,许多研究人员突出了这些限制。他们提出了新的研究线,专注于利用严格的统计和新技术,以便开发估计年龄的方法。我们在本研究中的主要目标是为加强这些新颖的想法,我们展示了关于在计算,表达和解释所获得的错误时某种年龄估计方法不足的现有经验证据。通过这种目标,已经进行了500种模拟,其中假设的研究团队开发和验证年龄估计的方法。本研究所采用的数据是从2000年发布的“疾病控制和预防(CDC)增长图表中的”疾病控制和预防(CDC)的数据“获得。图表与美国男性儿童的高度,重量和头部周长相关的年龄。五个学习算法已被雇用为年龄估计。我们已经进行了三个实验,其中已经分析了以下几个方面:在验证研究中可以获得“否定”结果的频率;这是比较和选择年龄估计方法的最合适的标准;应采用哪些分析来执行验证研究。结果表明,由于统计概念的混乱,验证研究的解释可能存在错误。为了得出结论,当在验证法医人类学中的年龄估计方法时,对正确的计算,表达和对错误的正确计算,表达和解释提出了“良好实践”的提议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号