首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Higher perinatal mortality in National Public Health System hospitals in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 1999: a compositional or contextual effect?
【24h】

Higher perinatal mortality in National Public Health System hospitals in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 1999: a compositional or contextual effect?

机译:巴西贝洛哈里桑塔的国家公共卫生系统医院的围产期死亡率较高,1999年:是组合效应还是背景效应?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: In Brazil, it was previously reported that in hospital perinatal, neonatal and infant mortality rates are higher for hospitals contracted to the National Public Health System (SUS) compared with non-SUS hospitals. We analyse whether this reflects a compositional effect (selection of patients) or a contextual effect. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 1999. POPULATION: A total of 36,469 births in 24 hospitals. METHODS: A multilevel analysis was carried out using information gathered at the individual level on maternal education (used as an indicator of socio-economic status), maternal age, type of pregnancy and delivery, birthweight and sex of the fetus. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Perinatal death. RESULTS: Risk factors for perinatal death included male sex (OR = 1.25; 95% CI 1.01-1.55), birthweight of 1500-2500 g (OR = 7.65; 95% CI 5.74-10.20), birthweight of 500-1500 g (OR = 187.54; 95% CI 141.31-248.39), less than 4 years of maternal education (OR = 2.93; 95%CI 1.68-5.10), as well as birth at private-SUS (OR = 2.92; 95% CI 1.87-4.54) or philanthropic-SUS hospitals (OR = 1.81; 95% CI 1.12-2.92). After controlling for individual characteristics, there was still a significant variation in perinatal deaths between hospitals categories. CONCLUSION: Independent of compositional (or individual) characteristics, hospital factors exert an influence on the risk of perinatal death, primarily hospital category related to SUS. Considering the highest proportion of births in SUS hospitals in Brazil, especially private-SUS hospitals, improving hospital quality of care is an urgent priority for reducing the toll of perinatal and infant mortality, as well as inequalities in these outcomes.
机译:目的:在巴西,以前有报道说,与非SUS医院相比,与国家公共卫生系统(SUS)签约的医院在围产期的新生儿和婴儿死亡率更高。我们分析这是否反映了组成效应(患者选择)或上下文效应。设计:基于人群的队列研究。地点:巴西贝洛奥里藏特,1999年。人口:24家医院共有36,469例婴儿出生。方法:使用在个人层面上收集的有关孕产妇教育(用作社会经济地位指标),产妇年龄,怀孕和分娩类型,出生体重和性别的信息进行了多层次分析。主要观察指标:围产期死亡。结果:围产期死亡的危险因素包括男性(OR = 1.25; 95%CI 1.01-1.55),出生体重1500-2500 g(OR = 7.65; 95%CI 5.74-10.20),出生体重500-1500 g(OR = 187.54; 95%CI 141.31-248.39),少于4年的孕产妇教育(OR = 2.93; 95%CI 1.68-5.10)以及在私人SUS出生(OR = 2.92; 95%CI 1.87-4.54) )或慈​​善SUS医院(OR = 1.81; 95%CI 1.12-2.92)。在控制了个人特征之后,各医院类别之间的围产期死亡仍然存在显着差异。结论:医院因素独立于成分(或个人)特征,会对围产期死亡的风险产生影响,主要是与SUS相关的医院类别。考虑到巴西SUS医院,尤其是私人SUS医院中分娩的比例最高,提高医院的护理质量是降低围产期和婴儿死亡率以及这些结果不平等的当务之急。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号