首页> 外文期刊>International journal of colorectal disease. >A comparison of surgical devices for grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease. Results from the LigaLongo Trial comparing transanal Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy and circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy
【24h】

A comparison of surgical devices for grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease. Results from the LigaLongo Trial comparing transanal Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy and circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy

机译:II级和III次痔疮手术装置的比较。 粘液型和圆形钉痔疮的曲韧科试验比较横向多普勒引导的痔核动脉连接的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Little is presently known on the impact of device type for Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation/mucopexy (DGHAL) or circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy (CSH) when a surgical treatment is considered for hemorrhoidal disease (HD). In this study, we aimed to compare the outcome in terms of adverse events and recurrence rate, of patients included in the multicenter LigaLongo RCT () according to the type of devices used.
机译:目前在考虑出痔疮疾病(HD)的手术治疗时,目前对装置类型对多普勒引导的痔疮动脉结扎/粘膜(DGHAL)或圆形吻合血管内(CSH)的影响。 在这项研究中,我们旨在根据所使用的设备类型,在多中心Ligalongo RCT()中包括不良事件和复发率方面的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号