首页> 外文期刊>International journal of colorectal disease. >Short- and long-term outcomes after transverse versus extended colectomy for transverse colon cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Short- and long-term outcomes after transverse versus extended colectomy for transverse colon cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:横向与横向结肠切除术后的短期和长期结果进行横向结肠癌。 系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BackgroundProvide the surgeon with a tool to decide the best surgical approach to transverse colon cancer.ObjectiveTo compare the surgical and oncological outcomes between transverse colectomy and extended hemicolectomy for patients with tumours of the transverse colon.Data sourcesA systematic search was performed in the electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE), using the following search terms and/or MeSH terms in all possible combinations: transverse, transversus, colectomy, hemicolectomy, segmental resection, transverse colon cancer. The last search was performed on 10 May 2018.Study selectionTwo independent authors (Mi.M. and N.V.) analysed each article and performed the data extraction independently. In case of disagreement, a third investigator was consulted (Ma.M.). Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.Data extraction and synthesisData regarding sample size, major clinical and demographic variables, oncologic outcomes and postoperative recovery and complications were extracted.Main outcome measuresMain outcomes analysed were anastomotic leakage, early mortality, hospital stay, operative time, overall complications rate, wound infection, harvested nodes and disease-free survival.ResultsNo statistical differences were found between transverse colectomy and extended hemicolectomy in short- and long-term outcomes; our results revealed no differences in disease-free survival between the two surgical approaches. As expected, a statistically significant difference was found in favour of extended hemicolectomy in terms of number of harvested lymph nodes.ConclusionsThis systematic review with meta-analysis focus on the two major approaches to transverse colon cancer. The reviewed evidence suggests that a conservative approach to transverse colon cancer is feasible and safe and oncological outcomes are comparable between a conservative and an extended surgical procedure.
机译:背景技术用工具来决定横向结肠癌的最佳手术方法的外科医生.Bobjectiveto对横向冒号的肿瘤患者进行横向联膜切除术和延长的半聚体切除术之间的手术和肿瘤切除术在电子数据库中进行了系统搜索( PubMed,Science,Scopus,Embase),使用以下搜索条件和/或网格术语在所有可能的组合中:横向,横向,联合肌切离术,半聚切除术,分段切除,横向结肠癌。最后一次搜索是在2018年10月10日执行的.Study SelectionTwo独立作者(MI.M.和N.v.)分析了每篇文章并独立执行数据提取。如有分歧,咨询了第三名调查员(MA.M.)。差异是通过共识解决的差异。关于样本规模,提取主要临床和人口统计变量,肿瘤结果和术后复苏以及并发症的差异..分析的成果措施结果是吻合泄漏,早期死亡率,住院,手术时间,整体并发症速率,伤口感染,收获的节点和无病生存。在短期和长期成果中横向联膜切除术和延长的半聚体切除术之间发现了统计差异;我们的结果表明,两种手术方法之间没有疾病存活率差异。如预期的那样,在收获的淋巴结数量方面发现统计学上有统计学意义有利于延长的半聚切除术。结论性能与Meta分析的系统审查,重点是横向结肠癌的两个主要方法。审查的证据表明,横向结肠癌的保守方法是可行的,安全性和肿瘤政治结果之间是可比的保守和扩展的外科手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号