首页> 外文期刊>International journal of applied mechanics >Treatment of Produced Water in the Permian Basin for Hydraulic Fracturing: Comparison of Different Coagulation Processes and Innovative Filter Media
【24h】

Treatment of Produced Water in the Permian Basin for Hydraulic Fracturing: Comparison of Different Coagulation Processes and Innovative Filter Media

机译:液压压裂盆地盆地生产水处理:不同凝固过程和创新过滤介质的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Produced water is the largest volume of waste product generated during oil and natural gas exploration and production. The traditional method to dispose of produced water involves deep well injection, but this option is becoming more challenging due to high operational cost, limited disposal capacity, and more stringent regulations. Meanwhile, large volumes of freshwater are used for hydraulic fracturing. The goal of this study is to develop cost-effective technologies, and optimize system design and operation to treat highly saline produced water (120-140 g/L total dissolved solids) for hydraulic fracturing. Produced water was collected from a salt water disposal facility in the Permian Basin, New Mexico. Chemical coagulation (CC) using ferric chloride and aluminum sulfate as coagulants was compared with electrocoagulation (EC) with aluminum electrodes for removal of suspended contaminants. The effects of coagulant dose, current density, and hydraulic retention time during EC on turbidity removal were investigated. Experimental results showed that aluminum sulfate was more efficient and cost-effective than ferric chloride for removing turbidity from produced water. The optimal aluminum dose was achieved at operating current density of 6.60 mA/cm(2) and 12 min contact time during EC treatment, which resulted in 74% removal of suspended solids and 53-78% removal of total organic carbon (TOC). The energy requirement of EC was calculated 0.36 kWh/m(3) of water treated. The total operating cost of EC was estimated $0.44/m(3) of treated water, which is 1.7 or 1.2 times higher than CC using alum or ferric chloride as the coagulant, respectively. The EC operating cost was primarily associated with the consumption of aluminum electrode materials due to faradaic reactions and electrodes corrosions. EC has the advantage of shorter retention time, in situ production of coagulants, less sludge generation, and high mobility for onsite produced water treatment. The fine particles and other contaminants after coagulation were further treated in continuous-flow columns packed with different filter media, including agricultural waste products (pecan shell, walnut shell, and biochar), and new and spent granular activated carbon (GAC). Turbidity, TOC, metals, and electrical conductivity were monitored to evaluate the performance of the treatment system and the adsorption capacities of different media. Biochar and GAC showed the greatest removal of turbidity and TOC in produced water. These treatment technologies were demonstrated to be effective for the removal of suspended constituents and iron, and to produce a clean brine for onsite reuse, such as hydraulic fracturing.
机译:生产的水是石油和天然气勘探和生产过程中产生的最大的废品量。处理生产水的传统方法涉及深度良好的注射,但由于高运营成本,有限的处置能力和更严格的法规,这种选择变得更具挑战性。同时,大量的淡水用于水力压裂。本研究的目标是开发经济高效的技术,并优化系统设计和操作,以治疗高盐水产生的水(120-140克/升总溶解固体)用于水力压裂。从新墨西哥州二叠纪盆地的盐水处理设施收集生产的水。将使用氯化铁和硫酸铝作为凝结剂的化学凝结(CC)与电凝(EC)与铝电极进行比较,以除去悬浮污染物。研究了EC期间凝结剂剂量,电流密度和液压保留时间对浊度去除的影响。实验结果表明,硫酸铝比氯化铁比氯化铁更有效,成本效益,用于去除生产的水中浊度。在EC处理期间,在6.60mA / cm(2)和12分钟接触时间的操作电流密度下实现最佳铝剂量,从而使悬浮固体的74%和53-78%除去总有机碳(TOC)。 EC的能量要求计算0.36千瓦时/ m(3)水处理。 EC的总运营成本估计0.44 / m(3)个处理水,分别使用明矾或氯化铁作为凝结剂的CC高1.7或1.2倍。由于游览反应和电极腐蚀,EC操作成本主要与铝电极材料的消耗相关联。 EC具有较短的保留时间,原位生产凝结剂,污泥产生较少,以及现场生产水处理的高迁移率。凝血后的细颗粒和其他污染物在用不同的过滤介质包装的连续流动柱中进一步处理,包括农业废物制品(山藻壳,核桃壳和生物炭)和新的和废粒状活性炭(GAC)。监测浊度,TOC,金属和导电性,以评估治疗系统的性能和不同介质的吸附能力。生物炭和GAC表现出最大的浊度和生产水中的浊度。这些处理技术被证明是有效地除去悬浮的成分和铁,并生产现场再利用的清洁盐水,例如液压压裂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号