...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of applied mechanics >Comparison of Searching Behaviour of Three Evolutionary Algorithms Applied to Water Distribution System Design Optimization
【24h】

Comparison of Searching Behaviour of Three Evolutionary Algorithms Applied to Water Distribution System Design Optimization

机译:三种进化算法的搜索行为比较应用于水分配系统设计优化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the past few decades, various evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have been applied to the optimization design of water distribution systems (WDSs). An important research area is to compare the performance of these EAs, thereby offering guidance for the selection of the appropriate EAs for practical implementations. Such comparisons are mainly based on the final solution statistics and, hence, are unable to provide knowledge on how different EAs reach the final optimal solutions and why different EAs performed differently in identifying optimal solutions. To this end, this paper aims to compare the real-time searching behaviour of three widely used EAs, which are genetic algorithms (GAs), the differential evolution (DE) algorithm and the ant colony optimization (ACO). These three EAs are applied to five WDS benchmarking case studies with different scales and complexities, and a set of five metrics are used to measure their run-time searching quality and convergence properties. Results show that the run-time metrics can effectively reveal the underlying searching mechanisms associated with each EA, which significantly goes beyond the knowledge from the traditional end-of-run solution statistics. It is observed that the DE is able to identify better solutions if moderate and large computational budgets are allowed due to its great ability in maintaining the balance between the exploration and exploitation. However, if the computational resources are rather limited or the decision has to be made in a very short time (e.g., real-time WDS operation), the GA can be a good choice as it can always identify better solutions than the DE and ACO at the early searching stages. Based on the results, the ACO performs the worst for the five case study considered. The outcome of this study is the offer of guidance for the algorithm selection based on the available computation resources, as well as knowledge into the EA's underlying searching behaviours.
机译:在过去的几十年中,各种进化算法(EAS)已应用于水分配系统(WDS)的优化设计。一个重要的研究领域是比较这些EA的性能,从而为实际实现提供适当的EA选择的指导。这种比较主要基于最终解决方案统计数据,因此无法提供关于如何不同的EAS如何达到最终最佳解决方案以及为什么在识别最佳解决方案时执行的不同EAS。为此,本文旨在比较三种广泛使用的EAS的实时搜索行为,即遗传算法(气体),差分演进(DE)算法和蚁群优化(ACO)。这三个EAS适用于五个WDS基准案例研究,具有不同的尺度和复杂性,并且使用一组五个度量来测量它们的运行时间搜索质量和收敛性。结果表明,运行时度量可以有效地揭示与每个EA相关的底层搜索机制,这显着超出了传统的运行结束解决方案统计信息的知识。如果由于其在维持勘探和剥削之间的平衡方面,允许的DE能够识别更好的解决方案。但是,如果计算资源相当有限或必须在很短的时间内进行决定(例如,实时WDS操作),则GA可以是一个不错的选择,因为它总是可以识别比DE和ACO更好的解决方案在早期搜索阶段。根据结果​​,ACO考虑了五项案例研究表现最差。本研究的结果是基于可用计算资源的算法选择的指导提供,以及知识进入EA的底层搜索行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号