首页> 外文期刊>International archives of allergy and immunology >Profile Shift in Latex Sensitization over the Last 20 Years
【24h】

Profile Shift in Latex Sensitization over the Last 20 Years

机译:在过去的20年里,乳胶敏感的轮廓转变

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy is commonly diagnosed according to medical history, skin allergy tests, and serological analyses. However, skin tests are increasingly being abandoned because of (i) their time-consuming nature, (ii) latex preparations for skin tests being not commercially available, and (iii) the use of in-house prepared test solutions is becoming ever more difficult due to increasing regulatory hurdles. In this light, we have evaluated differences in the profiles of current and former patients with suspected latex allergy. Methods: Sera of skin test-positive patients from a historic cohort (1995-2001, n = 149 patients) and currently (2014-2015, n = 48 patients) were simultaneously analyzed for specific IgE to latex by ImmunoCAP. If the serological screening was positive (= 0.35 kU/L), component-resolved diagnostics including profilins and cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCDs) were performed. Results: In contrast to 88% (131/149) of the skin test-positive patients from the 1990s, only 51.1% (24/47) of the current cohort were found positive for specific IgE to latex. While 48.3% (72/149) of the patients had a convincing positive history in the 1990s, current skin test-positive patients rarely reported a relevant medical history (8.5%, 4/47). Specific IgE levels to latex were significantly higher in former patients with suspected latex allergy (p 0.001) than in former sensitized individuals without allergy. However, this significant difference was lost in current allergic and sensitized patients with positive skin tests. Conclusion: Sensitization profiles in patients with latex allergy have changed significantly over the last 2 decades. Discrimination between NRL sensitization and clinical allergy remains a diagnostic challenge. Our data highlight the need for a combination of all 3 criteria, i. e., patient history, skin test, and analysis of specific IgE, for a correct diagnosis of latex allergy. (c) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景:天然橡胶胶乳(NRL)过敏通常根据病史,皮肤过敏测试和血清学分析诊断。然而,由于(i)耗时的性质(i)耗时性,(ii)皮肤试验的乳胶制剂不商用,(iii)在内部制备的测试解决方案的使用变得更加困难,乳胶试验越来越被遗弃由于监管障碍增加。在这种光线中,我们已经评估了当前和前患者疑似乳胶过敏的患者的差异。方法:皮肤试验阳性患者历史型队列(1995-2001,N = 149名患者)和目前(2014-2015,N = 48名患者)的血清被免疫皮划图同时分析了特定的IgE对乳胶。如果血清学筛查是阳性的(& = 0.35ku / l),则进行包括profilins和交叉反应性碳水化合物测定剂(CCD)的组分分辨诊断。结果:与20世纪90年代的皮肤试验阳性患者的88%(131/149)相比,仅针对特定IgE对乳胶阳性发现目前队列的51.1%(24/47)。虽然48.3%(72/149)患者在20世纪90年代令人信服的阳性历史,目前的皮肤试验阳性患者很少报告有关的病史(8.5%,4/47)。在前患者的涉及乳胶过敏(P <0.001)中的特异性IgE水平显着高于前以前的敏化个体,没有过敏。然而,这种显着差异在目前过敏和敏化患者患有阳性皮肤测试的患者中丢失。结论:乳胶过热患者的敏化型材在过去的2年里发生了显着变化。 NRL致敏与临床过敏之间的歧视仍然是诊断挑战。我们的数据突出了所有3个标准的组合的需要。 e,患者历史,皮肤测试和特异性IgE分析,用于正确诊断乳胶过敏。 (c)2018年S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号