首页> 外文期刊>International emergency nursing >The impact of walk-in centres and GP co-operatives on emergency department presentations: A systematic review of the literature
【24h】

The impact of walk-in centres and GP co-operatives on emergency department presentations: A systematic review of the literature

机译:步入中心和GP合作社对应急部门演示的影响:对文献的系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Highlights ? Workload and resource pressures on EDs require the development of applicable minor illness and injury pathways. ? Walk-in-centres have the potential to reduce ED workloads but more work is required to substantiate this pathway. ? GP cooperatives can reduce ED workloads but further evidence is required to be confident of the efficacy of this care pathway. Abstract Background Internationally, non-urgent presentations are increasing the pressure on Emergency Department (ED) staff and resources. This systematic review aims to identify the impact of alternative emergency care pathways on ED presentations – specifically GP cooperatives and walk-in clinics. Methods Based on a structured PICO enquiry with either walk-in clinic or GP cooperative as the intervention, a search was made for peer-reviewed publications in English, between 2000 and 2014. Medline plus, OVID, PubMed, and Google Scholar were searched. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) guidelines were used to assess study quality and data was extracted using an adapted JBI Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (QARI). Subsequent reporting followed the PRISMA guideline. Results Eleven high quality quantitative studies met the inclusion criteria. Walk-in clinics do have the potential to reduce non-urgent emergency department presentations, however evidence of this effect is low. GP cooperatives offer an alternative care stream for patients presenting to the ED and do significantly reduce local ED attendances. Community members need to be made aware of these options in order to make informed treatment choices. Conclusion GP cooperatives in particular do have the potential to reduce ED workload. Further research is required to uncover recent trends and patient outcomes for walk-in clinics and GP cooperatives.
机译:强调 ? EDS上的工作量和资源压力需要开发适用的轻微疾病和伤害途径。还步入中心有可能减少ed工作负载,但需要更多的工作来证实这条路。还GP合作社可以减少编辑工作负载,但需要进一步证据来对该护理途径的疗效充满信心。摘要背景国际上,非紧急演示正在增加应急部门(ED)员工和资源的压力。该系统审查旨在确定替代紧急护理途径对ED演示的影响 - 特别是GP合作社和步入式诊所。方法基于带有步入诊所或GP合作作为干预的结构化微微询问的方法,在2000年至2014年期间,为同行评审的出版物进行了搜索。搜索了Medline Plus,Ovid,PubMed和Google Scholar。关键评估技能计划(CASP)指南用于评估研究质量,使用适应的JBI定性评估和审查文书(Qari)提取数据。随后的报告遵循PRISMA指南。结果十一高质量的定量研究达到了纳入标准。步入式诊所确实有可能减少非紧急急诊部门的介绍,但是这种效果的证据很低。 GP合作社为提出ED的患者提供替代护理流,并确实减少了当地的射击出席。社区成员需要了解这些选项,以便做出明智的治疗选择。结论GP合作社尤其有可能降低ed工作量。需要进一步的研究来揭示近期步入诊所和GP合作社的趋势和患者结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号