首页> 外文期刊>Information Polity: The International Journal of Government and Democracy in the Information Age >Book Review: DuPont, Q. (2019) Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains Polity
【24h】

Book Review: DuPont, Q. (2019) Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains Polity

机译:图书评论:杜邦,Q.(2019)加密货币和区块

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A deluge in books published on cryptocurrencies, and their underlying block-chain technologies, has mirrored the boom and bust of interest in Bitcoin and its rollercoaster US dollar price. Many of these titles form little more than 'get rich quick' and techno-solutionist accounts written by, and for, technology evangelists, or industry practitioners with 'skin in the game'. Deviating from this flood of largely uncritical publications is a small, but growing, scholarly literature that offers much needed clarity and nuance of the block-chain and cryptocurrency phenomenon. These academic titles are notable for their interdisciplinary character. While economists have commanded (and still command!) much media commentary on Bitcoin dollar price swings; anthropologists (Brunton, 2019), computer scientists (Narayanan et al., 2016), as well as legal scholars (de Filippi & Wright, 2018; Herian, 2018; Werbach, 2018), and media studies scholars (Golumbia, 2016) have all provided insightful analyses.
机译:在加密货币上发布的书籍以及他们的潜在块链技术的洪水已经反映了比特币及其过山车美元价格的繁荣和萧条。这些标题中的许多标题都没有“获得丰富的快速”和技术解决方案账户,而且技术福音学家或在游戏中的皮肤上的行业从业者。偏离这一洪水的大部分不加临界出版物是一个小,但不断增长的学术文学,提供了很多所需的块链和加密和性能现象的清晰度和细微差别。这些学术职称对于他们的跨学科性质而言是值得注意的。虽然经济学家已经命令(并且仍在命令!)比特币美元价格波动的媒体评论;人类学家(Brunton,2019),计算机科学家(Narayanan等,2016)以及法律学者(De Filippi&Wright,2018; Herian,2018; Werbach,2018)和媒体研究学者(Golumbia,2016)拥有所有这些都提供了富有洞察力的分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号