首页> 外文期刊>Injury >Locking versus non-locking one-third tubular plates for treating osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: a comparative study
【24h】

Locking versus non-locking one-third tubular plates for treating osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: a comparative study

机译:用于治疗骨质疏松远端腓骨裂缝的非锁定三分之一管状板的锁定与非锁定的三分之一管状板:比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Ankle fractures represent the third most common fracture in elderly patients, after hip and wrist fractures. Distal fibula fractures in this population are closely related to osteoporosis, which renders commonly used methods of internal fixation technically demanding and prone to failure. Currently there is a tendency to fix osteoporotic metaphyseal and epiphyseal fractures with locking plates. However, published accounts about the use of this technology in osteoporotic distal fibula fractures are scarce. In this study we compare the results of two groups of patients who underwent surgery for these types of fracture, one group received locking and the other non-locking screws, both using one-third tubular plates.
机译:简介:踝关节骨折代表老年患者的第三次常见骨折,髋部和腕骨骨折。 该群体中的远端腓骨骨折与骨质疏松症密切相关,这使得常用的内固定方法技术苛刻和易于失败。 目前倾向于使用锁定板来修复骨质疏松性质和骨骺骨折。 但是,关于在骨质疏松远端腓骨裂缝中使用这种技术的发布账户是稀缺的。 在这项研究中,我们将两组患者的结果进行比较,接受这些类型的骨折的手术,一组接收锁定和其他非锁定螺钉,都使用三分之一管板。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号