首页> 外文期刊>Innovations: technology and techniques in cardiothoracic and vascular surgery >EuroSCORE Performance in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Discrimination Ability and External Calibration
【24h】

EuroSCORE Performance in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Discrimination Ability and External Calibration

机译:Eurecore在微创心脏手术辨别能力和外部校准中的性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: Prediction of operative risk in adults undergoing cardiac surgery remains a challenge. The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) is one of the most commonly used in clinical settings. Recently, the new EuroSCORE II was published attempting to improve the accuracy of risk prediction. We sought to assess the predictive value of EuroSCORE or EuroSCORE II in selected field of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent cardiac surgery operation with minimally invasive approach from 2007 to 2013 identified from prospective cardiac surgical database. Additional variables included in EuroSCORE II, but not in original EuroSCORE, were retrospectively collected via electronic health records reviewing. The C-statistic was calculated for the EuroSCORE (additive and logistic) and EuroSCORE n. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to assess model calibration by comparing observed and expected morality in number of risk strata. Results: There were 39 hospitals deaths (1.6%). A total of 2472 patients were identified from the main database. The mean ± SD logistic EuroSCORE was 7.6 ± 8.3, mean ± SD additive EuroSCORE was 6.1 ± 2.7, and mean ± SD EuroSCORE II was 2.9 ± 4.2. EuroSCORE logistic model performed with substantial accuracy of 0.78, EuroSCORE additive performed with accuracy of 0.78, and EuroSCORE II performed as almost perfect 0.82. Model calibration was poor in EuroSCORE II (χ2 = 17.57, P = 0.02), calibration for logistic EuroSCORE was also poor (χ2 = 140.58, P < 0.01), and additive model also (χ2 = 94.95, P < 0.01). The area under the curve was high in all algorithms; logistic EuroSCORE was 0.78 (95% confidence interval = 0.71-0.85), additive EuroSCORE was 0.79 (95% confidence interval = 0.71-0.86), and EuroSCORE II was 0.82 (95% confidence interval = 0.75-0.89). Conclusions: In overall settings, original EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II perform poorly in minimally invasive operation conditions. Data suggest that EuroSCORE could not be used for estimating operative risks correctly. New risk score should be explored, developed, and implemented for selective minimally invasive cohorts.
机译:目的:预测心脏手术的成年人的术风险仍然是一项挑战。欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(Euroscore)是临床环境中最常用的系统之一。最近,新的Euroscore II被公布,试图提高风险预测的准确性。我们试图评估Euroscore或Euroscore II的预测值,在最微创心脏手术领域。方法:从前瞻性心脏手术数据库中确定的2007年至2013年,以微创的方式接受心脏手术操作的患者。通过电子健康记录审查,回顾性地收集了欧千岛二,但不在原始欧千岛中包含的其他变量。为Euroscore(添加剂和物流)和Euroscore n计算了C统计。 Hosmer-Lemeshow测试用于评估模型校准,通过比较风险地层数量的观察和预期的道德。结果:有39家医院死亡(1.6%)。共有2472名患者从主数据库中确定。平均值±SD Logistic Euroscore为7.6±8.3,平均值±SD添加剂Euroscore为6.1±2.7,平均值±SD Euroscore II为2.9±4.2。 EuroScore Logistic模型以0.78,Euroscore添加剂的大量精度进行了大量精度,精度为0.78,Euroscore II的表现为0.82。 Mode校准在Euroscore II中差(χ2= 17.57,P = 0.02),物流Eurorcore的校准也差(χ2= 140.58,P <0.01)和添加剂模型(χ2= 94.95,P <0.01)。曲线下的区域在所有算法中都很高;物流Euroscore为0.78(95%置信区间= 0.71-0.85),欧千次摩鲁斯科摩鲁斯为0.79(95%置信区间= 0.71-0.86),EuroScore II为0.82(95%置信区间= 0.75-0.89)。结论:在整体环境中,原始Euroscore和Euroscore II在微创操作条件下表现不佳。数据表明,Euroscore无法正确估算操作风险。应探索,开发新的风险分数,以用于选择性微创套管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号