...
首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and organizational psychology >A Comparative Study Between Concentric Single-Needle Puncture Technique and Conventional 2-Needle Technique for Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Plus Corticosteroid Injections
【24h】

A Comparative Study Between Concentric Single-Needle Puncture Technique and Conventional 2-Needle Technique for Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Plus Corticosteroid Injections

机译:同心单针穿刺技术与常规2针技术对颞下颌关节关节性的比较研究加上皮质类固醇注射

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of the study was to compare 2 techniques of arthrocentesis, to find out the efficacy of one over the other at various parameters, and to contribute to the scarce literature of these 2 techniques. Forty patients reported with a chief complaint of pain in temporomandibular joint (TMJ), clicking in TMJ, and restricted mouth opening were included in this study. Twenty patients were divided into 2 groups, all reporting with temporomandibular disorders. Group A was treated with 2-needle technique of arthrocentesis, while group B underwent concentric needle technique of arthrocentesis under local anesthesia with Ringer's lactate solution. The operating time was found to be less in concentric needle technique (mean: 25.36 minutes) compared to 2-needle technique (mean: 42.82 minutes), and the difference was found to be statistically significant. Concentric needle technique proved to be a better alternative for TMJ arthrocentesis as it has quite a lot of advantages over 2-needle technique.
机译:该研究的目的是比较3种状过孔的技术,以在各种参数中找出一个在另一个方面的功效,并有助于这两种技术的稀缺文学。四十名患者报告颞下颌关节(TMJ)的主要抱怨,点击TMJ,本研究纳入了限制的口开口。二十名患者分为2组,所有报告都与颞下颌疾病。 A组是用3针技术治疗的关节整流膜,而B组在局部麻醉下具有林格氏乳酸溶液的局部麻醉下的同心针技术。与2针技术相比同心针技术被证明是TMJ关节周兴的更好的替代品,因为它具有相当大的2针技术的优点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号