...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of pediatrics >Nasal Injury with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: Need for 'Privileging' Nursing Staff
【24h】

Nasal Injury with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: Need for 'Privileging' Nursing Staff

机译:鼻损伤与持续的正气道压力:需要“特权”护理人员

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectivesUse of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in neonates is associated with nasal injury (NI) for which various risk factors related to the neonatal characteristics and properties of interfaces used have been reported. Privileging of nursing staff may influence safety and incidence of adverse events. In this prospective cohort study, authors studied the incidence of NI and risk factors for NI in babies requiring CPAP after privileging staff for CPAP care bundles.MethodsAll neonates on CPAP over a 6-mo period were included. Standard operating procedures were formulated and staff of NICU (nurses and doctors) were educated at the start of the study and periodically in 6 comprehensive areas of care- encompassing position of head, prongs and cap; nasal suctioning and interruptions in pressure on the nose. The staff who completed the training and evaluation were declared as privileged. NI (measured by a standard staging) and risk factors were predefined and studied.ResultsOf the 51 babies who required respiratory supports, 35 required CPAP care. Nine babies (25%) out of 35 who required CPAP had NI (2, 4, 3 babies had stages 1, II and III of NI respectively). Seventy seven percent of babies were cared for by privileged nurses. NI was significantly higher when cared for by non-privileged staff (66% vs. 11%, unadjusted RR=6.75, 95%CI 2.16-21.09). All other risk factors were not significant.ConclusionsNI was noted in 25% neonates on CPAP, and those cared for by non-privileged staff had higher chances of NI. Quality processes and emphasis on continued monitoring and evaluation of nursing skills may help prevent these untoward complications.
机译:NeoNates中连续正气道压力(CPAP)的侧面与鼻损伤(Ni)有关,鼻损伤(Ni)有关与使用的新生儿特征和使用的界面的性质有关的各种风险因素。护理人员的特权可能会影响不良事件的安全性和发病率。在这项未来的队列研究中,作者研究了在CPAP Care Bundles的特权工作人员进行CPAP的婴儿NI中NI和危险因素的发病率..包括在6-Mo期间的CPAP上的新生儿。制定标准的操作程序,尼古尔(护士和医生的工作人员在研究开始时教育,并定期在6个综合护理地区的头部,尖峰和帽子的综合地区;鼻腔吸附和中断鼻子的压力。完成培训和评估的工作人员被宣布为特权。 Ni(通过标准分期测量)和风险因素是预先义的,研究的。审查了51个需要呼吸支持的婴儿,35个所需的CPAP关心。在35个需要CPAP的九个婴儿(25%)有NI(2,4,3个婴儿分别有Ni的阶段1,2和III)。百分之七十七名婴儿被特权护士照顾。当非特权员工(66%与11%,未调整的RR = 6.75,95%CI 2.16-21.09)进行关心时,NI显着提高。所有其他风险因素并不重要.Clusionsni在CPAP中的25%新生儿中指出,由非特权员工关心的人有更高的NI机会。质量流程和重点是继续监测和评估护理技能可能有助于防止这些不良并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号