首页> 外文期刊>Acta Radiologica >Perfusion MRI (dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging) with different measurement approaches for the evaluation of blood flow and blood volume in human gliomas
【24h】

Perfusion MRI (dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging) with different measurement approaches for the evaluation of blood flow and blood volume in human gliomas

机译:使用不同测量方法的灌注MRI(动态磁化率对比成像)评估人脑胶质瘤的血流量和血容量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in the evaluation of brain tumors. Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) is usually obtained by dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI using normal appearing white matter as reference region. The emerging perfusion technique arterial spin labelling (ASL) presently provides measurement only of cerebral blood flow (CBF), which has not been widely used in human brain tumor studies. Purpose: To assess if measurement of blood flow is comparable with measurement of blood volume in human biopsy-proven gliomas obtained by DSC-MRI using two different regions for normalization and two different measurement approaches. Material and Methods: Retrospective study of 61 patients with different types of gliomas examined with DSC perfusion MRI. Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in tumor portions with maximum perfusion on rCBF and rCBV maps, with contralateral normal appearing white matter and cerebellum as reference regions. Larger ROIs were drawn for histogram analyses. The type and grade of the gliomas were obtained by histopathology. Statistical comparison was made between diffuse astrocytomas, anaplastic astrocytomas, and glioblastomas. Results: rCBF and rCBV measurements obtained with the maximum perfusion method were correlated when normalized to white matter (r = 0.60) and to the cerebellum (r = 0.49). Histogram analyses of rCBF and rCBV showed that mean and median values as well as skewness and peak position were correlated (0.61 , r < 0.93), whereas for kurtosis and peak height, the correlation coefficient was about 0.3 when comparing rCBF and rCBV values for the same reference region. Neither rCBF nor rCBV quantification provided a statistically significant difference between the three types of gliomas. However, both rCBF and rCBV tended to increase with tumor grade and to be lower in patients who had undergone resection/treatment. Conclusion: rCBF measurements normalized to white matter or cerebellum are comparable with the established rCBV measurements used for the clinical evaluation of cerebral gliomas.
机译:背景:灌注磁共振成像(MRI)越来越多地用于评估脑肿瘤。相对脑血容量(rCBV)通常通过使用正常出现的白质作为参考区域的动态磁化率对比(DSC)MRI获得。新兴的灌注技术动脉自旋标记(ASL)目前仅提供对脑血流(CBF)的测量,而在人脑肿瘤研究中尚未广泛使用。目的:通过使用两个不同的区域进行标准化和两种不同的测量方法,评估通过DSC-MRI获得的经活组织检查证实的神经胶质瘤的血流量测量是否可与血容量测量相媲美。材料与方法:回顾性研究61例不同类型神经胶质瘤的DSC灌注MRI检查。将感兴趣区域(ROIs)放置在肿瘤部位,在rCBF和rCBV图上以最大灌注,对侧正常出现白质和小脑作为参考区域。绘制较大的ROI用于直方图分析。通过组织病理学获得神经胶质瘤的类型和等级。弥漫性星形细胞瘤,间变性星形细胞瘤和胶质母细胞瘤之间进行统计学比较。结果:将最大灌注法获得的rCBF和rCBV测量值归一化为白质(r = 0.60)和小脑(r = 0.49)时是相关的。对rCBF和rCBV的直方图分析显示,平均值和中位数以及偏斜度和峰位置相关(0.61,r <0.93),而对于峰度和峰高,在比较rCBF和rCBV值时相关系数约为0.3。相同的参考区域。 rCBF和rCBV定量均未提供这三种类型的神经胶质瘤之间的统计学差异。但是,rCBF和rCBV都随着肿瘤等级的增加而增加,而在接受切除/治疗的患者中较低。结论:标准化为白质或小脑的rCBF测量值与用于脑胶质瘤临床评估的既定rCBV测量值相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号