首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric chemistry and physics >Quantification and evaluation of atmospheric pollutant emissions from open biomass burning with multiple methods: a case study for the Yangtze River Delta region, China
【24h】

Quantification and evaluation of atmospheric pollutant emissions from open biomass burning with multiple methods: a case study for the Yangtze River Delta region, China

机译:多种方法开放生物质燃烧的大气污染物排放量化与评价 - 以江三角地区为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Air pollutant emissions from open biomass burning (OBB) in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) were estimated for 2005-2015 using three (traditional bottom-up, fire radiative power (FRP), and constraining) approaches, and the differences among those methods and their sources were analyzed. The species included PM10, PM2.5, organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), CH4, non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs), CO, CO2, NOx, SO2 and NH3. The interannual trends in emissions with FRP-based and constraining methods were similar to the fire counts in 2005-2012, while those with the traditional method were not. For most years, emissions of all species estimated with the constraining method were smaller than those with the traditional method except for NMVOCs, while they were larger than those with the FRP-based method except for EC, CH4 and NH3. Such discrepancies result mainly from different masses of crop residue burned in the field (CRBF) estimated in the three methods. Chemistry transport modeling (CTM) was applied using the three OBB inventories. The simulated PM10 concentrations with constrained emissions were closest to the available observations, implying that the constraining method provided the best emission estimates. CO emissions in the three methods were compared with other studies. Similar temporal variations were found for the constrained emissions, FRP-based emissions, GFASv1.0 and GFEDv4.1s, with the largest and the lowest emissions estimated for 2012 and 2006, respectively. The temporal variations in the emissions based on the traditional method, GFEDv3.0, and the method of Xia et al. (2016) were different. The constrained CO emissions in this study were commonly smaller than those based on the traditional bottom-up method and larger than those based on burned area or FRP in other studies. In particular, the constrained emissions were close to GFEDv4.1s that contained emissions from small fires. The contributions of OBB to two particulate pollution ev
机译:长江三角洲(yrd)开放生物量燃烧(obb)的空气污染物排放量估计2005 - 2015年使用三(传统的自下而上,火辐射电源(FRP)和约束)方法,以及这些方法的差异他们的来源被分析了。该物种包括PM10,PM2.5,有机碳(OC),元素碳(EC),CH4,非甲烷挥发性有机化合物(NMVOCs),CO,CO 2,NOx,SO2和NH 3。基于FRP和约束方法的排放的年际趋势与2005 - 2012年的火灾数相似,而传统方法的趋势也不是。在大多数年份,除了NMVOC之外,估计的约束方法估计的所有物种的排放量小于NMVOC,而EC,CH4和NH3除了基于FRP的方法的方法小于传统方法的排放。这种差异主要来自在三种方法中估计的田间(CRBF)中燃烧的不同群体残留物。使用三个OBB库存施用化学传输建模(CTM)。具有约束排放的模拟PM10浓度最接近可用的观察结果,这意味着约束方法提供了最佳排放估计。三种方法中的共同排放与其他研究进行了比较。为受约束的排放,基于FRP的排放,GFASV1.0和GFEDV4.1S的相似时间变化分别为2012年和2006年的最大和最低排放量。基于传统方法,GFEDV3.0和XIA等人的方法的排放时间变化。 (2016)是不同的。该研究的受约束的CO排放通常小于基于传统自下而上方法的那些,大于其他研究中的烧伤区域或FRP的那些。特别是,约束的排放接近GFEDV4.1,其中包含小火灾的排放。 obb对两个微粒污染的贡献

著录项

  • 来源
    《Atmospheric chemistry and physics》 |2019年第1期|共22页
  • 作者

    Yang Yang; Zhao Yu;

  • 作者单位

    Nanjing Univ State Key Lab Pollut Control &

    Resource Reuse 163 Xianlin Ave Nanjing 210023 Jiangsu Peoples R China;

    Nanjing Univ State Key Lab Pollut Control &

    Resource Reuse 163 Xianlin Ave Nanjing 210023 Jiangsu Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 大气科学(气象学);
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号