首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Sterilisation during unplanned caesarean sections for women likely to have a completed family--should they be offered? Experience in a country with limited health resources.
【24h】

Sterilisation during unplanned caesarean sections for women likely to have a completed family--should they be offered? Experience in a country with limited health resources.

机译:为可能有完整家庭的妇女在计划外的剖腹产手术中进行绝育手术-应该为她们提供吗?在一个卫生资源有限的国家的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine if it is proper to give a woman of higher parity who needs at short notice a caesarean section the option of a tubal ligation. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Maternity unit of a tertiary hospital in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. POPULATION: Women of higher parity who were delivered by an emergency caesarean section, by an elective caesarean section or vaginally and who had been asked or not asked whether they wanted a tubal ligation. METHODS: A postal questionnaire and visits to the participants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Satisfaction with (in)fertility after having had, or not had, the option of a tubal ligation with the last delivery. RESULTS: In women who had an emergency caesarean section and who were successfully followed up, 301/418 (72.0%) had been offered a tubal ligation and 241/301 (80.1%) accepted. Of the 301 women, 269 (89.4%) were happy with the outcome. Thirty-two women were unhappy (of whom 6 had tubal ligation, 24 had declined a sterilisation and in 2 cases the doctor forgot to do the sterilisation). Of the 117/418 women not offered a tubal ligation, 75/117 (64.1%) regretted not having had one. The relative risk of being unhappy with the consequences of not being offered tubal ligation compared with being given this option was 6.0 (95% CI 4.2-8.6, P < 0.001). Tubal ligations performed during emergency caesarean sections had no higher regret rate (2.5%) in this setting than those performed during elective caesarean sections (3.2%) and not much higher than postpartum sterilizations (0.5%). Women who did not have a tubal ligation during an emergency caesarean section regretted this (56.4%) significantly more often than women who did not have a tubal ligation with an elective caesarean section (34.6%) or after vaginal delivery (45.0%) (P < 0.01 and P < 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that the need to take an urgent decision resulted in more regret following tubal ligation. Women were far more likely to regret declining a tubal ligation (40%) than regret accepting one (2.5%). In this setting, some women are more likely to die of the next pregnancy than to regret an emergency tubal ligation.
机译:目的:为了确定是否需要给予较高胎龄的女性以短时间内进行剖腹产的选择,可以选择结扎输卵管。设计:回顾性研究。地点:津巴布韦布拉瓦约一家三级医院的妇产科。人口:通过紧急剖腹产,择期剖腹产或阴道分娩的高等产妇女,她们被问或不问是否要进行输卵管结扎术。方法:邮寄问卷并访问参与者。主要观察指标:对输卵管结扎或未结扎的患者,对不孕的满意度。结果:在进行了紧急剖腹产并成功随访的女性中,进行了3​​01/418(72.0%)的输卵管结扎术,并接受了241/301(80.1%)的接受结扎。在301位女性中,有269位(89.4%)对结果满意。 32名妇女不满意(其中6名进行了输卵管结扎,24名拒绝进行绝育,2名医生忘记进行绝育)。在没有进行输卵管结扎的117/418妇女中,有75/117(64.1%)感到遗憾的是没有输卵管结扎。与不给予输卵管结扎的后果相比,不给予输卵管结扎的后果的相对风险为6.0(95%CI 4.2-8.6,P <0.001)。在这种情况下,紧急剖腹产时进行的输卵管结扎术的悔恨率(2.5%)不高于选择性剖腹产时进行的输卵管结扎术(3.2%),并且不比产后绝育(0.5%)高。在紧急剖腹产手术中未进行输卵管结扎的女性(56.4%)比在选择性剖宫产术中未进行输卵管结扎的女性(34.6%)或在阴道分娩后未进行输卵管结扎的女性(45.0%)更经常对此表示遗憾。 <0.01和P <0.02)。结论:我们没有证据表明输卵管结扎术后需要做出紧急决定会导致更多的遗憾。女性后悔输卵管结扎的可能性更大(40%),而不是后悔接受输卵管结扎的可能性(2.5%)。在这种情况下,有些女人死于下一次怀孕,而不是后悔输卵管结扎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号