首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Plastic Surgery >Assessing Gaze Patterns in Common Cosmetic Procedures With Eye-Tracking Technology
【24h】

Assessing Gaze Patterns in Common Cosmetic Procedures With Eye-Tracking Technology

机译:用眼跟踪技术评估常见化妆品手术的凝视图案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Understanding the salient features that draw focus when assessing aesthetics is important for maximizing perceived outcomes. Eye-tracking technology provides an unbiased method for determining the features that draw attention when evaluating aesthetic plastic surgery. This study aimed to characterize viewing patterns of plastic surgery patients and laypeople when assessing facial cosmetic procedure images. Methods Twenty women who previously underwent cosmetic procedures and twenty women without a history of cosmetic procedures were shown sixteen pairs of preprocedure and postprocedure images of patients who underwent laser resurfacing or lip augmentation. Image pairs were randomized to whether preprocedural or postprocedural images came first. Participants viewed each image until they decided upon an aesthetic rating (scored 1-10), while an eye-tracking device recorded participants' gaze. Results The patient group's average ratings were 8.2% higher for preprocedural images and 13.3% higher for postprocedural images (P< 0.05 for both). The patient group spent 20.4% less time viewing images but spent proportionally more time evaluating the relevant features of each procedure (41.7% vs 23.3%,P< 0.01), such as the vermillion border of the upper lip, labial commissure, or periorbital region (P< 0.05 for each). For both groups, the most common site of first fixation was the nose for laser resurfacing images (26.6%) and the labial commissure for lip augmentation images (37.7%). Both groups spent more time fixated on nasolabial folds, marionette lines, and the periorbital region when viewing pre-laser resurfacing images than postprocedural images. Overall, each group had similar viewing patterns for time to first fixation on and frequency of fixations for a particular feature. Conclusions Women who previously underwent cosmetic procedures view postprocedural images more favorably and require less time to assess images, likely related to familiarity with aesthetic procedures. These women spend more time fixated on relevant features, such as the vermillion border of the upper lip, the labial commissure, and the periorbital region, than the control group. Notably, each group spent less time focused on regions associated with wrinkles, such as the marionette and periorbital areas in post-laser resurfacing images, suggesting that the procedure reduces attention-drawing features in these areas.
机译:背景技术在评估美学时,吸引焦点的突出特征对于最大化感知结果是重要的。眼动追踪技术提供了一种无偏见的方法,用于确定评估美学整形手术时引起注意的特征。本研究旨在在评估面部化妆品程序图像时表征整形手术患者和外国人的观察模式。方法有二十名患者在没有美容程序历史的情况下接受过化妆品和二十名女性的妇女在接受激光重新铺设或嘴唇增强的患者的患者的十六对预衰退和后期图像上显示了十六对。图像对被随机化,以便先前或后期图像首先是。参与者查看了每张图片,直到他们决定审美评级(得分1-10),而一台眼睛跟踪设备记录了参与者的凝视。结果患者组的平均评级对于预兴普图像的平均评级增加了8.2%,后术后图像高出13.3%(两者P <0.05)。患者组花费了20.4%的时间观看图像,但花费比例地花费更多时间评估每个程序的相关特征(41.7%与23.3%,P <0.01),例如上唇,唇缘,底层区域的朱米边界(每次P <0.05)。对于这两个组,最常见的第一固定位点是激光重新铺设图像的鼻子(26.6%)和唇缘增强图像的唇息(37.7%)。当观察比后期图像的预激光铺设图像时,两个组在鼻根折叠,杂种线和底骨区域上都花了更多的时间。总的来说,每个组具有类似的观看模式,用于首先固定和频率的特定特征的定影。结论妇女以前接受了化妆品的妇女,更有利地查看后预先形成的图像,并且需要更少的时间来评估图像,可能与熟悉审美程序有关。这些妇女花费更多地对照组,例如上唇的朱米,唇缘,底部地区的朱红色,而不是对照组。值得注意的是,每个群体都花费较少的时间聚焦在与皱纹相关的区域上,例如激光后腐蚀图像中的MariOnette和Periobital区域,这表明该过程减少了这些区域中的注意力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号