...
首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Interventions during pregnancy to reduce excessive gestational weight gain: a systematic review assessing current clinical evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.
【24h】

Interventions during pregnancy to reduce excessive gestational weight gain: a systematic review assessing current clinical evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

机译:怀孕期间的干预措施,以减少过多的妊娠期体重增加:使用建议,评估,发展和评估分级(GRADE)系统评估当前临床证据的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Excessive weight gain during pregnancy is common in developed countries and increases the risk of complications during pregnancy, delivery and the postpartum period, which can affect both maternal and fetal outcome. Interventions to reduce excessive gestational weight gain have previously not been systematically evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether published trials of interventions to reduce excessive gestational weight gain are of sufficient quality and provide sufficient data to enable evidence-based recommendations to be developed for clinical practice in antenatal care. SEARCH STRATEGY: A literature search was conducted in the scientific databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Cinhal and Pedro, and the reference lists of relevant articles were reviewed. The literature search was concluded on 15 August 2009. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were considered for inclusion. As the number of published RCTs was limited, we also considered for inclusion all nonrandomised intervention studies that included a control group. Systematic reviews were examined to identify additional original studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the methods and results of all included articles. Extracted data were classified using the GRADE system. MAIN RESULTS: Four intervention studies with a randomised controlled design and four intervention trials with a nonrandomised controlled design met the inclusion criteria. As a consequence of important limitations in study design, inconsistency and lack of directness, the overall quality of evidence was judged to be very low using the GRADE system. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results of published intervention trials are of insufficient quality to enable evidence-based recommendations to be developed for clinical practice in antenatal care.
机译:背景:在发达国家,怀孕期间体重过度增加很常见,并且增加了怀孕,分娩和产后并发症的风险,这可能会影响母婴结局。以前尚未使用“建议,评估,发展和评估分级”(GRADE)系统来系统评估减少妊娠体重过多增加的干预措施。目的:确定已发表的减少过度妊娠体重增加的干预试验是否具有足够的质量,并提供足够的数据,以便能够为循证医学建议制定产前保健的临床实践。搜索策略:在科学数据库PubMed,Cochrane图书馆,Cinhal和Pedro中进行文献检索,并审查了相关文章的参考文献清单。文献检索于2009年8月15日结束。选择标准:所有随机对照试验(RCT)均被考虑纳入。由于已发布的随机对照试验的数量有限,我们还考虑将包括对照组的所有非随机干预研究纳入研究。对系统评价进行了审查,以确定其他原始研究。数据收集与分析:两位审稿人独立评估了方法的质量以及所有纳入文章的结果。使用GRADE系统对提取的数据进行分类。主要结果:四项具有随机对照设计的干预研究和四项具有非随机对照设计的干预试验均符合纳入标准。由于研究设计的重大局限性,前后矛盾和缺乏直接性,使用GRADE系统将证据的总体质量判断为非常低。作者的结论:公开干预试验的结果质量不足,不足以使基于证据的建议能够为产前护理的临床实践提供依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号