首页> 外文期刊>Adsorption >Heavy reflux PSA cycles for CO2 recovery from flue gas:Part I.Performance evaluation
【24h】

Heavy reflux PSA cycles for CO2 recovery from flue gas:Part I.Performance evaluation

机译:从烟气中回收二氧化碳的重度回流PSA循环:第一部分性能评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study evaluated nine stripping PSA cycle configurations,all with a heavy reflux(HR)step,some with a light reflux(LR)step,and some with a recovery(REC)or feed plus recycle(F+R)step,for concentrating CO2 from stack and flue gas at high temperature(575 K)using a K-promoted HTlc.Under the process conditions studied,the addition of the LR step always resulted in a better process performance;and in all cases,the addition of a REC or F+R step surprisingly did not affect the process performance except at low feed throughputs,where either cycle step resulted in a similar diminished performance.The best cycle based on overall performance was a 5-bed 5-step stripping PSA cycle with LR and HR from countercurrent depressurization(CnD)(98.7% CO2 purity,98.7% CO2 recovery and 5.8 L STP/hr/kg feed throughput).The next best cycle was a 5-bed 5-step stripping PSA cycle with LR and HR from LR purge(96.5% CO2 purity,71.1% CO2 recovery and 57.6 L STP/hr/kg feed throughput).These improved performances were caused mainly by the use of a very small purge to feed ratio(gamma=0.02)for the former cycle and a larger one(gamma=0.50)for the latter cycle.The former cycle was good for producing CO2 at high purities and recoveries but at lower feed throughputs,and the latter cycle was useful for obtaining CO2 at high purities and feed throughputs but at lower recoveries.The best performance of a 4-bed 4-step stripping PSA cycle with HR from CnD was disappointing because of low CO2 recoveries(99.2% CO2 purity,15.2% CO2 recovery and 72.0 LSTP/hr/kg feed throughput).This last result revealed that the recoveries of this cycle would always be much lower than the corresponding cycles with a LR step,no matter the process conditions,and that the LR step was very important to the performance of these HR cycles for this application and process conditions studied.
机译:这项研究评估了9种汽提PSA循环配置,全部采用重回流(HR)步骤,有些采用轻回流(LR)步骤,有些采用回收(REC)或进料加回收(F + R)步骤进行浓缩使用K促进的HTlc在高温(575 K)下从烟囱和烟道气中产生的CO2。在研究的工艺条件下,添加LR步骤始终会带来更好的工艺性能;在所有情况下,都添加REC或F + R步骤出人意料地不会影响工艺性能,除非进料量低,否则任何一个循环步骤都会导致类似的性能下降。基于整体性能的最佳循环是5床5步汽提PSA循环和LR和逆流减压(CnD)产生的HR(98.7%的CO2纯度,98.7%的CO2回收率和5.8 L STP / hr / kg的饲料通量)。下一个最佳循环是5床5步汽提PSA循环,LR和LR吹扫(96.5%的CO2纯度,71.1%的CO2回收率和57.6 L STP / hr / kg的饲料通量)。这些改进的性能主要是由于前一个循环使用很小的吹扫进料比(gamma = 0.02)和后一个循环使用较大的吹扫进料比(gamma = 0.50)。前一个循环有利于高纯度和高回收率的CO2产生但是在较低的进料通过量下,后面的循环对于获得高纯度和进料通过量但回收率较低的CO2是有用的。CnDHR的4床4步汽提PSA循环的最佳性能令人失望,因为CO2较低回收率(99.2%的CO2纯度,15.2%的CO2回收率和72.0 LSTP / hr / kg的饲料通量)。最后的结果表明,无论采用哪种工艺,该循环的回收率总是比相应的LR步骤的回收率低得多对于此应用和所研究的工艺条件,LR步骤对于这些HR循环的性能非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号