【24h】

Cyclic load testing and ultimate failure strength of suture anchors in the acetabular rim.

机译:髋臼边缘缝合锚杆循环负荷测试和终极故障强度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To determine the resistance to cyclic stress and load-to-failure strength of several suture anchors suitable for hip arthroscopy. METHODS: Ten polyetheretherketone (PEEK) PushLock, PEEK SutureTak, and Bio-SutureTak anchors (Arthrex, Naples, FL); Lupine Loop BR anchors (DePuy Mitek, Norwood, MA); Bio-Mini Revo anchors (ConMed Linvatec, Largo, FL); and BioRaptor 2.9 AB anchors (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA) were inserted in rotation into different locations on the rim of 4 matched pairs of potted acetabula clamped to the base of a servohydraulic testing machine. The anchors' sutures were cyclically pulled in line with the insertion angle. Displacement at 100 and 500 cycles, yield load, ultimate failure load, and failure mode were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Most of the displacement observed during cyclic loading occurred in the first 100 cycles, except for the BioRaptor 2.9 AB, which showed twice as much displacement at 500 cycles as at 100 cycles. The Lupine Loop BR cyclic displacement was greater than that of the PEEK PushLock (at 100 cycles also), Bio-SutureTak, and PEEK SutureTak at 500 cycles (P < .05). The BioRaptor 2.9 AB cyclic displacement was significantly greater at 100 and 500 cycles than that of the PEEK PushLock and Bio-SutureTak (P < .05). The mean ultimate failure loads for these anchors ranged from 154 N (PEEK SutureTak) to 255 N (Bio-Mini Revo) and was statistically equivalent (P = .139). Correlation analysis showed no significant associations between anchor stiffness, cyclic load displacement, or failure load. CONCLUSIONS: Anchors with specific indications for hip arthroscopy showed very little displacement and had consistent failure loads under cyclic conditions in the acetabular rim. All hip anchors except the BioRaptor 2.9 AB showed less than 2.0 mm of displacement after 500 cycles. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Biomechanical testing of suture anchors designated for hip arthroscopy should be performed in the acetabular rim before their use. Suture anchors used for shoulder arthroscopy may not perform as well in the hip.
机译:目的:确定适用于髋关节镜检查的几个缝合线锚的循环应力和载荷输向强度的抵抗力。方法:十种聚醚醚酮(PEEK)PUSPLOCK,PEEK SUTURETAK和BIO-SUTURETAK锚(ARTHEX,那不勒斯,FL);羽扇豆圈Br锚(Depuy Mitek,Norwood,Ma);生物迷你Revo锚(CONMED LINVATEC,LARGO,FL);和BioRaptor 2.9 AB锚(史密斯和侄子,和妈妈,MA)被旋转进入不同位置的4匹配对盆地髋臼的边缘的不同位置,夹在伺服液试验机的基座上。锚点缝合线与插入角度循环拉动。记录了100和500个循环,屈服负荷,最终故障负载和故障模式的位移。进行统计分析。结果:在前100个循环中发生循环载荷期间观察到的大多数位移,除了生物介金2.9Ab,其显示在100个循环中的500个循环中的两倍。 Lupine Loop BR循环位移大于PEEK推锁(在100个循环中也),Bio-Suturetak和Peek Suturetak的500次循环(P <.05)。 BioRaptor 2.9 AB循环位移在100和500周期中明显大于PEEK推锁和BIO-SUTURETAK(P <.05)。这些锚的平均终极故障负载范围为154 n(PEEK SUTURETAK)至255n(BIO-MINI REVO),并且统计上等效(P = .139)。相关分析显示锚刚度,循环负荷位移或故障负载之间没有显着的关联。结论:具有髋关节镜检查的特定适应症的锚点显示出极少的位移,并且在髋臼边缘中的循环条件下具有一致的失效载荷。除了BioRaptor 2.9 AB之外的所有髋部锚点显示500次循环后的均位移小于2.0毫米。临床相关性:用于髋关节镜检查的缝合锚杆的生物力学测试应在髋臼边缘使用之前进行。用于肩部关节镜检查的缝线锚在臀部也不会表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号