首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Biomechanical comparison of 4 double-row suture-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques using different medial-row configurations.
【24h】

Biomechanical comparison of 4 double-row suture-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques using different medial-row configurations.

机译:不同内侧配置4双排缝合桥接旋转箍修复技术的生物力学比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: Biomechanical comparison of different suture-bridge configurations of the medial row with respect to initial construct stability (time 0, porcine model). METHODS: In 40 porcine fresh-frozen shoulders, the infraspinatus tendons were dissected from their insertions. All specimens were operated on by use of the suture-bridge technique, only differing in terms of the medial-row suture-grasping configuration, and randomized into 4 groups: (1) single-mattress (SM) technique, (2) double-mattress (DM) technique, (3) cross-stitch (CS) technique, and (4) double-pulley (DP) technique. Identical suture anchors were used for all specimens (medial: Bio-Corkscrew FT 5.5 [Arthrex, Naples, FL]; lateral: Bio-PushLock 3.5 [Arthrex]). All repairs were cyclically loaded from 10 to 60 N until 10 to 200 N (20-N stepwise increase after 50 cycles each) with a material testing machine. Forces at 3 and 5 mm of gap formation, mode of failure, and maximum load to failure were recorded. RESULTS: The DM technique had the highest ultimate tensile strength (368.6 +/- 99.5 N) compared with the DP (248.4 +/- 122.7 N), SM (204.3 +/- 90 N), and CS (184.9 +/- 63.8 N) techniques (P = .004). The DM technique provided maximal force resistance until 3 and 5 mm of gap formation (90.0 +/- 18.1 N and 128.0 +/- 32.3 N, respectively) compared with the CS (72 +/- 8.9 N and 108 +/- 20.2 N, respectively), SM (66.0 +/- 8.9 N and 90.0 +/- 26.9 N, respectively), and DP (62.2 +/- 6.2 N and 71 +/- 13.2 N, respectively) techniques (P < .05 for each 3 and 5 mm of gap formation). The main failure mode was suture cutting through the tendon. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing the 4 different suture-bridge techniques, we found that modified application of suture-bridge repair with double medial mattress stitches significantly enhanced biomechanical construct stability at time 0 in this porcine ex vivo model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This technique increases initial stability and resistance to suture cutting through the rotator cuff tendon after arthroscopic suture-bridge repair.
机译:目的:相对于初始构建稳定性的不同缝合线桥配置的生物力学比较(时间0,猪模型)。方法:在40种猪新鲜冷冻肩部中,侵害Inthaspinatus肌腱从它们的插入中解剖。通过使用缝合线桥技术操作所有标本,只有不同的内侧缝合型抓握配置,并随机分为4组:(1)单床垫(SM)技术,(2)双床垫(DM)技术,(3)交叉针脚(CS)技术,(4)双轮(DP)技术。相同的缝线锚用于所有标本(内侧:生物 - 软木塞FT 5.5 [Arthrex,那不勒斯,FL];横向:生物Pushlock 3.5 [Arthrex])。使用材料试验机循环地将所有修理从10到60n循环加载到10至60n(在50次循环后20-n逐步增加)。记录了3和5毫米的间隙形成,故障模式和最大负荷的力进行了效力。结果:与DP(248.4 +/- 122.7 n),SM(204.3 +/- 90n)和CS(184.9 +/- 63.8(184.9 +/- 63.8),DM技术具有最高的抗拉强度(368.6 +/- 99.5 n),SM(204.3 +/- 90n)和Cs(184.9 +/- 63.8) n)技术(p = .004)。与CS(72 +/- 8.9 n和108 +/- 20.2 n相比,DM技术为3和5mm的间隙形成(90.0 +/-18.1n和128.0 +/- 32.3n)提供了最大力分别),SM(分别为66.0 +/- 8.9 n和90.0 +/- 26.9 n,DP(分别为62.2 +/- 6.2 n和71 +/- 13.2 n)技术(每个P <0.05 3和5毫米的间隙形成)。主故障模式是缝线切割肌腱。结论:比较4种不同的缝合线桥技术,我们发现用双侧床垫缝线的缝合线桥修复的修改应用在该猪前体内模型中的时间0显着提高了生物力学构建稳定性。临床相关性:通过在关节镜缝合桥修复后,该技术提高了通过转子袖带肌腱切割的初始稳定性和缝合线的抵抗力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号