首页> 外文期刊>Arthritis research & therapy. >Window of opportunity to achieve major outcomes in early rheumatoid arthritis patients: how persistence with therapy matters
【24h】

Window of opportunity to achieve major outcomes in early rheumatoid arthritis patients: how persistence with therapy matters

机译:在早期类风湿性关节炎患者中实现重大结果的机会窗口:治疗的持久性是多么持久

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: Benefits of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) in early rheumatoid arthritis patients (ERAP) will be achieved if patients follow prescribed treatment. Objective was to investigate whether timing of first non-persistence period and/or duration of persistence during the first 4 years of follow-up predicted disease outcomes at the 5th year in a cohort of ERAP, initiated in 2004. Patients and Methods: Up to February 2015, charts of 107 ERAP with at least 5 years of follow-up and prospective 6-month assessments of disease activity, disability and persistence were reviewed. Non-persistence was defined as omission of DMARD and/or corticosteroids for at least 7 consecutive days; regarding methotrexate, one weekly missing dose was considered non-persistence. Persistence was recorded through an interview (up to 2008) and thereafter through a questionnaire; persistence duration was recorded in months of continuous medicationtaking. At the 5th year, disease activity was defined according to Disease Activity Score (DAS)28, and disability according to Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Descriptive statistics and linear and Cox regression analyses were used. Results: At study entry, patients were more frequently middle-aged (39.1?±?13.3 years) and female (88.8 %), as well as more likely to have high disease activity and disability. Over the first 4 years of follow-up, 54.2 % of the patients had indications for oral corticosteroids and all traditional DMARDs. Almost 70 % had at least one period of non-persistence, and their follow-up (median, 25th–75th interquartile range) to first non-persistence period was 13 months (1–31). Persistence duration during the first 4 years predicted subsequent DAS28 (in addition to gender and baseline DAS28) and HAQ (in addition to age). During the 5th year, 68 patients (56 women) achieved sustained remission (DAS28?
机译:引言:如果患者遵循规定的治疗,将实现疾病改性抗风湿药物(DMARD)在早期类风湿性关节炎患者(ERAP)中的益处。目的是调查第一个非持续期和/或持续时间的时间在2004年第5年在第5年的前4年的前4年后的第一个不持续期间和持续时间的持续时间。患者和方法:最多2015年2月,综述了107次ERAP的图表,患有至少5年的疾病活动,残疾和持久性的前进和预期的6个月评估。非持久性被定义为连续至少7天的DMARD和/或皮质类固醇的遗漏;关于甲氨蝶呤,一周缺失的剂量被认为是非持久性的。通过面试(最多2008年)录制持久性,此后通过调查问卷;持续时间在连续的药物中记录。在第5年,根据疾病活动评分(DAS)28,根据健康评估问卷(HAQ),定义疾病活动。使用描述性统计和线性和COX回归分析。结果:在学习进入,患者更频繁的中年(39.1?±13.3岁)和女性(88.8%),以及更容易具有高疾病活动和残疾。在前4年的后续行动中,54.2%的患者对口腔皮质类固醇和所有传统DMARD有适应症。近70%的人至少有一个不持久性,他们的后续行动(中位数,25-75次界定范围)至第一个非持久性期为13个月(1-31)。前4年期间的持久性持续时间预测后续DAS28(除了性别和基线DAS28)和HAQ(除了年龄之外)。在第5年期间,68名患者(56名妇女)取得持续缓解(DAS28?<?2.6)。在女性群体(n?=α95),基线DAS28(差距[或],0.65; 95%置信区间[CI],0.50-0.83; p?= 0.001)和持久性持续时间(或1.04; 95% CI,1-1.08; p?= 0.05)是预测因子。此外,84名患者达到持续职能(HAQ <0.21),基线DAS28和年龄是唯一的预测因子。第一个非持久性期的时间没有影响结果。结论:在RA的前4年内与DMARD的持久性持续时间预测随后的eRAP中的有利结果;额外的预测因子是较年轻的年龄,男性性别和疾病的诊断疾病活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号