首页> 外文期刊>Arthritis & rheumatology. >New Perspectives in Rheumatology: Implications of the Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat and Allopurinol in Patients With Gout and Cardiovascular Morbidities Trial and the Associated Food and Drug Administration Public Safety Alert
【24h】

New Perspectives in Rheumatology: Implications of the Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat and Allopurinol in Patients With Gout and Cardiovascular Morbidities Trial and the Associated Food and Drug Administration Public Safety Alert

机译:风湿病学的新透视:Febuxostat和Allopurinol心血管安全对痛风和心血管病理审判患者的影响以及相关食品和药物管理公共安全警报

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) issued a public safety alert, responding to the results of the now‐published Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat and Allopurinol in Patients With Gout and Cardiovascular Morbidities ( CARES ) trial. The CARES trial showed no significant difference between allopurinol and febuxostat in the primary composite end point of cardiovascular ( CV ) events in subjects with gout and established CV comorbidities at baseline. However, there was a significantly increased risk of CV and all‐cause mortality with febuxostat. Urate‐lowering therapy ( ULT ) is central to the long‐term management of gout, and xanthine oxidoreductase inhibitor ( XOI ) therapy is the consensus first‐line approach. Allopurinol is generally the first XOI used, but febuxostat is an effective XOI option, and is commonly used when allopurinol is not tolerated. These data are further relevant since CV comorbidities are common in gout. Here, we examine why the CARES trial was done, and discuss other, ongoing comparative studies of febuxostat and allopurinol whose results are awaited. We assess the strengths and limitations of the CARES trial, and appraise the robustness and biologic plausibility of the results. The CARES trial does not prove that febuxostat raises CV mortality risk, but suggests greater risk with febuxostat than allopurinol. The CARES trial results do not support first‐line use of febuxostat ULT , and raise questions about febuxostat placement at various pharmacologic ULT decision tree branches. Alternatives to febuxostat that are frequently effective include allopurinol dose escalation and uricosuric therapy alone or combined with allopurinol. The FDA safety alert highlights the need for shared ULT medical decision‐making with gout patients, including discussion of the CV safety of febuxostat.
机译:最近,美国粮食和药物管理局(FDA)发出了公共安全警报,响应了痛风和心血管病理(关心)试验的患者现出的Febuxostat和Allopurinol的生态血管安全结果。关心试验显示出在基线痛风中的心血管(CV)事件的主要复合终点中的Allopurinol和Febuxostat之间没有显着差异,并在基线建立了CV可用性。然而,与Febuxostat的CV风险显着增加了CV和全导致死亡率。降低治疗(ULT)是痛风长期管理的核心,黄嘌呤氧化还原酶抑制剂(XOI)治疗是共识的一线方法。 Allopurinol通常是第一个使用的XOI,但Febuxostat是一种有效的XOI选择,并且当不容忍出Allopurinol时通常使用。由于CV合并症在痛风中常见,这些数据进一步相关。在这里,我们检查为什么关心审判已完成,并讨论Febuxostat的其他持续的比较研究,以及疗法等待的结果。我们评估关心审判的优势和限制,并评估结果的稳健性和生物合理性。关心试验不证明Febuxostat提高了Cv死亡率风险,但表明Febuxostat的风险更大,而不是Allopurinol。关心试验结果不支持Febuxostat ult的一线使用,并在各种药理学ULT决策树分支中提出关于Febuxostat安置的问题。常用的费布斯特·费布抑制液的替代品包括单独促进的Allopurinol剂量升级和单独的尿尿疗法或与Allopurinol合并。 FDA安全警报突出了对痛风患者的共享ULT医学决策的需求,包括讨论Febuxostat的CV安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号