...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Toxicology >Integration of epidemiological findings with mechanistic evidence in regulatory pesticide risk assessment: EFSA experiences
【24h】

Integration of epidemiological findings with mechanistic evidence in regulatory pesticide risk assessment: EFSA experiences

机译:在监管农药风险评估中与机械证据的流行病学调查结果集成:EFSA经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Toxicological risk assessment of plant protection products (PPP) is currently carried out with the principal input from regulatory toxicology studies following OECD test guidelines, with little input from epidemiological data. An EFSA-commissioned systematic review of pesticide epidemiological studies (Ntzani et al. in Literature review on epidemiological studies linking exposure to pesticides and health effects. EFSA supporting publication 2013:EN-497, 2013) revealed statistically significant associations, among others, between pesticide exposures, and Parkinson's disease and childhood leukemia. Thereafter, EFSA launched a project with a mandate for the plant protection products and their residues (PPR) Panel to set the ground for the use of epidemiological data in the risk assessment of pesticides, as requested by Regulation (EC) 1107/2009. The project culminated with the publication of two EFSA's scientific opinions on the potential contribution of experimental investigations and epidemiological studies in PPP risk assessment and with the scientific conference held on 20 November 2017, in Parma, Italy. The application of modern methodologies in exposure assessment, toxicology and epidemiology would improve the pesticide risk assessment process and support a mechanistic shift for the integration of these three disciplines under a novel paradigm in risk assessment. The application of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) conceptual framework to this approach would contribute to gain insight into the biological plausibility of a hazard identified in epidemiological or experimental studies and would inform an Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA) within a regulatory context.
机译:目前植物保护产品(PPP)对植物保护产品(PPP)的毒理风险评估目前进行了对经合组织试验指南后的监管毒理学研究的主要投入,从流行病学数据中没有输入。 EFSA委托农药流行病学研究的系统审查(NTZANI等人。在杀虫剂和健康效果中的流行病学研究中的文献综述。EFSA支持出版物2013:EN-497,2013)揭示了农药之间的统计上有意义的协会暴露和帕金森病和儿童白血病。此后,EFSA推出了一个项目,该项目为植物保护产品及其残留物(PPR)小组的任务,以便根据法规(EC)1107/2009的要求,在杀虫剂的风险评估中设定使用流行病学数据的理由。该项目宣布了两个EFSA关于PPP风险评估中实验调查和流行病学研究的潜在贡献的科学意见,并在2017年11月20日在意大利帕尔马举行的科学会议上。现代方法在暴露评估,毒理学和流行病学中的应用将改善农药风险评估过程,并支持在风险评估的新型范式下整合这三个学科的机制转变。不利结果途径(AOP)概念框架对这种方法的应用将有助于深入了解流行病学或实验研究中鉴定的危害的生物合理性,并将在监管背景下提供综合方法来测试和评估(IATA) 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号