首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases: A Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Research >Reducing arthritis fatigue impact: two-year randomised controlled trial of cognitive behavioural approaches by rheumatology teams (RAFT)
【24h】

Reducing arthritis fatigue impact: two-year randomised controlled trial of cognitive behavioural approaches by rheumatology teams (RAFT)

机译:减少关节炎疲劳影响:风湿病学团队的两年随机对照治疗认知行为方法(筏)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To see if a group course delivered by rheumatology teams using cognitive-behavioural approaches, plus usual care, reduced RA fatigue impact more than usual care alone.Multicentre, 2-year randomised controlled trial in RA adults (fatigue severity>6/10, no recent major medication changes). RAFT (Reducing Arthritis Fatigue: clinical Teams using CB approaches) comprises seven sessions, codelivered by pairs of trained rheumatology occupational therapists/nurses. Usual care was Arthritis Research UK fatigue booklet. Primary 26-week outcome fatigue impact (Bristol RA Fatigue Effect Numerical Rating Scale, BRAF-NRS 0–10). Intention-to-treat regression analysis adjusted for baseline scores and centre.308/333 randomised patients completed 26?week data (156/175 RAFT, 152/158 Control). Mean baseline variables were similar. At 26 weeks, the adjusted difference between arms for fatigue impact change favoured RAFT (BRAF-NRS Effect ?0.59, 95%?CI –1.11 to -0.06), BRAF Multidimensional Questionnaire (MDQ) Total ?3.42 (95% CI –6.44 to -0.39), Living with Fatigue ?1.19 (95% CI –2.17 to -0.21), Emotional Fatigue ?0.91 (95% CI –1.58 to -0.23); RA Self-Efficacy (RASE, +3.05, 95%?CI 0.43 to 5.66) (14 secondary outcomes unchanged). Effects persisted at 2?years: BRAF-NRS Effect ?0.49 (95% CI ?0.83 to -0.14), BRAF MDQ Total ?2.98 (95% CI ?5.39 to -0.57), Living with Fatigue ?0.93 (95% CI ?1.75 to -0.10), Emotional Fatigue ?0.90 (95% CI ?1.44, to -0.37); BRAF-NRS Coping +0.42 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.77) (relevance of fatigue impact improvement uncertain). RAFT satisfaction: 89% scored > 8/10 vs 54% controls rating usual care booklet (p<0.0001).Multiple RA fatigue impacts can be improved for 2?years by rheumatology teams delivering a group programme using cognitive behavioural approaches.ISRCTN52709998.
机译:看看是否使用认知行为方法提供风湿病团队的组课程,加上平常的护理,减少了ra疲劳影响,而不是通常的护理。ra成年人的2年随机对照试验(疲劳严重程度> 6/10)。最近的主要药物改变)。 RAFT(减少关节炎疲劳:使用CB方法的临床团队)包括七次会话,由培训的风湿病学职业治疗师/护士进行多次。通常护理是关节炎研究英国疲劳小册子。主要26周的结果疲劳影响(Bristol Ra疲劳效果数值评级尺度,BRAF-NRS 0-10)。适用于基线评分的意向治疗回归分析和CEDRE.308 / 333随机患者完成26?周数据(156/175 RAFT,152/158控制)。平均基线变量相似。在26周时,武器之间的调整后差异为疲劳抗冲击变化有利的筏子(BRAF-NRS效应?0.59,95%?CI -1.11至-0.06),BRAF多维问卷(MDQ)总数?3.42(95%CI -6.44 -0.39),疲劳生活?1.19(95%CI -2.17至-0.21),情绪疲劳?0.91(95%CI -1.58至-0.23); RA自效(Rase,+ 3.05,95%?CI 0.43至5.66)(14次次要结果不变)。效果在2年持续存在?年份:BRAF-NRS效果?0.49(95%CI〜0.83至-0.14),BRAF MDQ总数?2.98(95%CI?5.39至-0.57),疲劳?0.93(95%CI? 1.75至-0.10),情绪疲劳?0.90(95%CI?1.44,至-0.37); BRAF-NRS应对+0.42(95%CI 0.08至0.77)(疲劳影响改善不确定的相关性)。 RAFT满意度:89%得分> 8/10 VS 54%控制评级通常护理小册子(P <0.0001)。使用认知行为方法提供组计划的量ra疲劳造成的2多年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号