首页> 外文期刊>Annals of surgical oncology >Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Treated by Perioperative Systemic Chemotherapy and Cytoreductive Surgery With or Without Mitomycin C-Based HIPEC: A Comparative Study Using the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS)
【24h】

Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Treated by Perioperative Systemic Chemotherapy and Cytoreductive Surgery With or Without Mitomycin C-Based HIPEC: A Comparative Study Using the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS)

机译:通过围手术期全身化疗和细胞霉素治疗的结肠直肠腹膜转移,具有或不含丝霉素C基高度的,使用腹膜表面疾病严重程度评分(PSDS)进行比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background The Prodige-7 trial has questioned the role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC-PM). Patients and Methods We compared a prospectively collected group of 48 patients undergoing oxaliplatin/irinotecan-based perioperative systemic chemotherapy (s-CT) with targeted agents, and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) (no-HIPEC group) with 48 controls undergoing the same perioperative s-CT and CRS/HIPEC (HIPEC group). Patients were matched (1:1) according to the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score, completeness of cytoreduction, history of extraperitoneal disease (EPD), and Peritoneal Cancer Index. Results The groups were comparable, except for a higher number of patients in the HIPEC group with World Health Organization performance status 0, pN2 stage primary tumor, and treated with preoperative s-CT. Forty-one patients in the no-HIPEC group and 43 patients in the HIPEC group had optimal comprehensive treatment (P = 0.759), defined as complete cytoreduction of PM and margin-negative EPD resection. Median follow-up was 31.6 months in the no-HIPEC group and 39.9 months in the HIPEC group. Median overall survival was 39.3 months in the no-HIPEC group and 34.8 months in the HIPEC group (P = 0.702). In the two groups, severe morbidity occurred in 14 (29.2%) and 13 (27.1%) patients, respectively (P = 1.000), with no operative deaths. On multivariate analysis, left-sided primary and curative treatment independently correlated with better survival while HIPEC did not (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.47-1.15; P = 0.178). Conclusions Our results confirmed that, in selected patients, perioperative s-CT and surgical treatment of CRC-PM resulted in unexpectedly high survival rates. Mitomycin C-based HIPEC did not increase morbidity but did not impact prognosis.
机译:背景技术Prodipe-7试验质疑高温腹膜化疗(HIPEC)在结直肠癌(CRC-PM)治疗腹膜转移中的作用。患者和方法与靶向剂的预期收集的48名患者的48名患者组织48名患者进行了比较,以及具有48种对照同样围手术期的48种对照的细胞导致手术(CRS)(No-Hipec组) -CT和CRS / HIPEC(HIPEC组)。根据腹膜表面疾病严重程度评分,细胞渗透,腹膜疾病病史(EPD)和腹膜癌指数的患者匹配(1:1)。结果群体具有可比性,除了具有世界卫生组织性能状态0,PN2阶段原发性肿瘤的高度高等患者的患者,并用术前S-CT治疗。 No-Hipec组中的四十一名患者和43名高症组患者具有最佳的综合治疗(P = 0.759),定义为PM和边缘阴性EPD切除的完全细胞渗。 No-Hipec集团的中位后续时间为31.6个月,高度高度集团39.9个月。中位数在No-Hipec组中的整体存活率为39.3个月,在高度高度集团中34.8个月(P = 0.702)。在两组中,患有14例(29.2%)和13名(27.1%)患者的严重发病率(p = 1.000),没有手术死亡。在多变量分析中,左侧初级和治疗治疗与更好的存活率相关,而HIPEC没有(危险比0.73; 95%置信区间0.47-1.15; p = 0.178)。结论我们的结果证实,在选定的患者中,围手术期的S-CT和CRC-PM的手术治疗导致出乎意料的存活率。丝霉素C基高症未增加发病率,但未影响预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号