...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta tropica: Journal of Biomedical Sciences >Comparison of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ZCL) by a randomized clinical trial in Iran.
【24h】

Comparison of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ZCL) by a randomized clinical trial in Iran.

机译:在伊朗进行的一项随机临床试验中,比较米替福辛和葡甲胺锑酸盐治疗人畜共患的皮肤利什曼病(ZCL)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study was a randomized, open label comparison that was designed to determine efficacy and safety of miltefosine as the first oral drug for the treatment of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major in comparison with meglumine antimoniate. Complete clinical response was defined as 100% re-epithelialization of the lesion. Definitions of lesion cure and failure were based on both clinical and parasitological criteria two weeks after the end of treatment and clinical recovery three months after this period. Of 32 patients enrolled for miltefosine treatment 28 patients completed treatment, of which 26 were cured at three months, corresponding to a cure rate of 92.9% on a per protocol analysis, and 81.3% according to intention to treat analysis. There was one failure (3.1%), one relapse (3.1%) and four dropouts due to lack of tolerability (12.5%) during the first week of treatment. Of 31 patients who received intramuscular meglumine antimoniate (20mgSb(5)/kg body weight daily for 14 days) 25 were cured (83.3% on a per protocol basis, 80.6% on intention to treat basis), five failed (16.1%) and one was lost (3.2%) at 3-month follow-up. At 6-month follow-up after the end of treatment, no relapse was observed. Both regimens were tolerated but averages of nausea (32.2%) and vomiting (21.5%) were observed in patients during two weeks after initiation of miltefosine treatment. Other gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and total adverse events were not statistically different in the two groups during one to four weeks after therapy initiation. No relevant changes were observed in levels of liver enzymes, creatinine and hematological tests before and after end of treatment in both groups. In conclusion, miltefosine is apparently at least as good as meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. major in Iran, based on parasitological as well as clinical criteria two weeks, three months, and six months after end of treatment.
机译:这项研究是一项随机,开放标签的比较,旨在确定与米格鲁宁锑酸镁相比,米替福星作为治疗由利什曼原虫引起的人畜共患的皮肤利什曼病的第一种口服药物的疗效和安全性。完全的临床反应被定义为病变的100%重新上皮化。治疗结束两周后根据临床和寄生虫学标准对病变治愈和失败进行定义,此后三个月进行临床恢复。在接受32例米替福辛治疗的患者中,有28例完成了治疗,其中26例在三个月后治愈,根据方案分析,治愈率为92.9%,根据治疗意图分析为81.3%。在治疗的第一周内,由于缺乏耐受性(一次失败)(3.1%),一次复发(3.1%)和四个辍学(12.5%)。在31名接受肌内葡甲胺锑酸盐(20 mgSb(5)/ kg体重每天持续14天)的患者中,有25例得到治愈(按方案计83.3%,按治疗意愿计80.6%),5例失败(16.1%)和在3个月的随访中,有1例丢失(3.2%)。治疗结束后的6个月随访中,未观察到复发。两种方案均可以耐受,但是在开始使用米替福辛治疗后的两周内,患者平均出现恶心(32.2%)和呕吐(2​​1.5%)。在开始治疗后的一到四周内,两组的其他胃肠道,肌肉骨骼和总不良事件在统计学上没有差异。两组治疗前后肝酶,肌酐和血液学检查水平均无相关变化。总之,根据寄生虫病学和临床标准,在治疗结束后两周,三个月和六个月,米替福星显然至少与抗葡糖胺甲葡胺一样好,可治疗由伊朗大麦芽孢杆菌引起的皮肤利什曼病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号