【24h】

Liberating the NHS?

机译:解放NHS?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Reflecting on the 2006 NHS White Paper, Professor Stephenson (now President of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health) observed that successive reforms stemmed from government determination to ensure National Health Service (NHS) Trusts should break even financially. He implied that this goal might be questionable, not least because children's services were likely to suffer disproportionately. We now have yet another White Paper ('Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS') proposing the most fundamental changes to the health service since its inception. If adopted, these proposals will establish a full healthcare market, with all hospitals becoming Foundation Trusts and being able to expand private patient beds without limit. For patients, 'integrated care' will follow the American pattern with a tripartite model of private ownership and management of hospitals, served by clinician networks and operating on insurance-based principles. While there is no mention in the White Paper of the role of consultants (clearly not seen as an important issue), it is already certain that pay, conditions and employment prospects for many NHS employees, including doctors, are likely to suffer in the name of 'efficiency' savings.
机译:在2006年的NHS白皮书上反映了斯蒂芬森教授(现在的儿科和儿童健康学院)教授观察到源于政府决心的连续改革,以确保国家卫生服务(NHS)信托应甚至在经济上违反。他暗示这一目标可能是值得怀疑的,尤其是因为孩子的服务可能不成比例地遭受痛苦。我们现在还有另一份白皮书('股权和卓越:解放NHS')提出自成立以来对卫生服务的最基本的变化。如果通过,这些提案将建立一个完整的医疗保健市场,所有医院都成为基金会信托,能够在没有限制的情况下扩大私人患者床。对于患者来说,“综合护理”将遵循美国模式与三方私人所有权和医院管理的模式,由临床医生网络提供服务,并在基于保险的原则上运营。虽然在顾问作用的白皮书中没有提到(显然没有被视为一个重要的问题),但已经确定了许多NHS员工,包括医生的薪酬,条件和就业前景,可能会遭受名称'效率'储蓄。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号