首页> 外文期刊>Arabian journal of geosciences >Investigation of the accuracy of linear and nonlinear time series models in modeling and forecasting of pan evaporation in IRAN
【24h】

Investigation of the accuracy of linear and nonlinear time series models in modeling and forecasting of pan evaporation in IRAN

机译:伊朗泛蒸发建模和预测中线性和非线性时间序列模型精度的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Water evaporation process is one of the main components of the hydrological cycle, according to which the correct estimation of this phenomenon plays an important role in irrigation management and river flow forecasting. Statistical and random models in the form of time series analysis are commonly used methods of estimation and forecasting. In this study, ARMA (autoregressive moving average), ARIMA (autoregressive integrated moving average), PARMA (periodic autoregressive moving average), and BL (bilinear) time series models (TSMs) are used to predict the annual and monthly pan evaporation values from the evaporation stations in several provinces of Iran in a 20-year statistical period. Results showed that PARMA model's accuracy in term of correlation coefficient and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency for almost all 31 stations had a precise forecasting among other proposed TSMs. For PARMA model, the forecasting accuracy in term of NSE indicated that PARMA model almost was the promising model among other linear and nonlinear TSMs in prediction of Epan for all stations, except Arak (NSE=0.94) and Qom (NSE=0.93). The ARIMA model for Khorramabad and Bandar Abbas with NSE=0.52 had the unreliable prediction for Epan compared with other stations. In addition, Arak station in term of RMSE had the least error, 23.79 mm/day and 10.90 mm/day, respectively, for training and testing stages among the other stations.
机译:水蒸发过程是水文循环的主要组成部分之一,根据该方法的正确估计在灌溉管理和河流预测中起着重要作用。时间序列分析形式的统计和随机模型是常用的估计方法和预测方法。在本研究中,ARMA(自回归移动平均),ARIMA(自回归综合移动平均),帕尔马(周期性自回归移动平均)和BL(双线性)时间序列模型(TSMS)用于预测年度和月度平移蒸发值20年统计期间伊朗若干省份蒸发站。结果表明,几乎所有31个站的相关系数和NASH-Sutcliffe效率期间的帕尔马模型的准确性在其他提出的TSM中具有精确的预测。对于帕尔马模型,NSE期间的预测精度表明,除了Arak(NSE = 0.94)和QOM(NSE = 0.93)之外,帕尔马模型几乎是其他线性和非线性TSM之间的有前途的模型。与NSE = 0.52的Khorramabad和Khorramabad和Bandar ABBA的Arima模型对EPAN的不可靠预测与其他站相比。此外,RMSE期间的Arak站分别具有23.79毫米/天和10.90毫米/天的误差,用于培训和测试阶段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号