...
首页> 外文期刊>Arabian journal of geosciences >Identification of sedimentary facies with well logs: an indirect approach with multinomial logistic regression and artificial neural network
【24h】

Identification of sedimentary facies with well logs: an indirect approach with multinomial logistic regression and artificial neural network

机译:具有良好原木的沉积相的识别:具有多项式逻辑回归和人工神经网络的间接方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Taking K-successions of the H-Zone of the Pearl River Mouth Basin as a testing example, we used two kinds of approaches to implement the microfacies identification. One is a direct identification, the other is an indirect approach in which we conducted the lithofacies classification first and then identified the microfacies based on previously estimated lithofacies. Both approaches were trained and checked by interpretations of experienced geologists from real subsurface core data. Multinomial logistic regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) were used in these two approaches as classification algorithms. Cross-validations were implemented. The source data setwas randomly divided into training subset and testing subset. Four models, namely, MLR_ direct, ANN_direct, MLR_indirect, and ANN_indirect, were trained with the training subset. The result of the testing set shows that the direct approaches (MLR_direct and ANN_direct) perform relatively poor with a total accuracy around 75%. While the indirect approaches (MLR_indirect and ANN_indirect) perform much better with a total accuracy of around 89 and 82%, respectively. This indirect method is simple and reproducible, and it could lead to a robust way of analyzing sedimentary microfacies of horizontal wells with little core data or even are almost never cored while core data are available for nearby vertical wells.
机译:以珠江口盆地的H次追逐作为一个检测例,我们使用了两种方法来实现微面积鉴定。一个是直接识别,另一个是一种间接方法,我们首先进行锂外分类,然后基于先前估计的锂外鉴定微缩醛。这两种方法都是通过来自真实地下核心数据的经验丰富的地质学家的解释进行培训和检查。多项式逻辑回归(MLR)和人工神经网络(ANN)用于这两种方法作为分类算法。实施交叉验证。源数据集随机分为训练子集和测试子集。有四种模型,即MLR_ Direct,Ann_Direct,MLR_INDIRECT和ANN_INDILECT,训练了训练子集。测试集的结果表明,直接方法(MLR_DIRECT和ANN_DIRECT)执行相对较差的总精度约为75%。虽然间接方法(MLR_INDILECT和ANN_INDILECT)分别以左右89%和82%的总精度执行更好。这种间接方法简单且可重复,它可能导致分析水平井的沉积微缩放,几乎没有核心数据,甚至几乎从未充电,而核心数据可用于附近的垂直孔。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Arabian journal of geosciences》 |2017年第11期|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Beijing Normal Univ Coll Resources Sci &

    Technol Beijing 100875 Peoples R China;

    Beijing Normal Univ Coll Resources Sci &

    Technol Beijing 100875 Peoples R China;

    Sun Yat Sen Univ Ctr Earth Environm &

    Resources Guangzhou 510275 Guangdong Peoples R China;

    Beijing Normal Univ Coll Resources Sci &

    Technol Beijing 100875 Peoples R China;

    Shandong Univ Sci &

    Technol Coll Geol Sci &

    Engn Qingdao 266500 Shandong Peoples R China;

    Shandong Univ Sci &

    Technol Coll Geol Sci &

    Engn Qingdao 266500 Shandong Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 地质学;
  • 关键词

    Microfacies; Well logs; Core; Lithofacies;

    机译:微缩醛;井日志;核心;岩型;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号