首页> 外文期刊>Applied Animal Behaviour Science >Location of supplementary feed and water troughs on the sward affects movement and spatial distribution of Brahman cattle (Bos indicus)
【24h】

Location of supplementary feed and water troughs on the sward affects movement and spatial distribution of Brahman cattle (Bos indicus)

机译:涂层上的补充饲料和水槽的位置会影响婆罗门牛的运动和空间分布(Bos indicus)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The grazing dynamics of animals differ depending on whether they are raised on rangeland or sward areas. Grazing patterns of cattle raised on rangeland can be modified by the location of supplement feed and water troughs. However, no information about the use of this strategy is available for swards. Thus, the effects of the location of supplementary feed and water troughs in small (7500m(2)) irrigated swards on movement, behavior and distribution were studied in a herd of 15 Brahman cows. The herd grazed on five swards in rotation, for seven days on each sward, so that each sward then had 28 days of rest. There were four rotations, giving four replicates of each of five treatments. For each rotation, one of the following treatments was randomly assigned to each sward. Supplementary feed and water troughs were: T1 in the same corner of the sward; T2 separate, each in the middle of one of the shorter sides of the sward; T3 separate in diagonally opposite corners; T4 separate in adjacent corners; T5 together in the sward center. The behavior and location of each cow was registered on a daily basis, every 2 h from 9:00 to 15:00 h, 7 days/week, using instantaneous scan sampling during the 140 days that the experiment lasted. Total distance traveled of each cow (i.e. the sum of Euclidean distances between the four subsequent positions of each cow within each day) was longer in T2 and T3 than in T5 (159.8, 162.5 vs 119.5 m respectively; p = 0.006), with the rest of the treatments showing intermediate values. The distance to the nearest cow was longer in T1 vs. T2 and T3 (6.2 vs 4.0 and 4.7 m, respectively; p = 0.007). Similarly, the herd home range was greater in T1 vs. T2 (792.6 vs. 574.7 m 2 , respectively; p = 0.01). Regardless of the treatment, social disruption occurred on day 1, which gradually decline through the week of grazing. The results show that the location of supplementary feed and water troughs affects the movement and cattle distribution in small (& 1 ha) irrigated swards. This might have practical applications in the design of grazing strategies and in the animal welfare of cattle maintained on small swards.
机译:动物的放牧动态因其在牧场或草坪地区是否被提出而异。在牧场上提出的牛的放牧模式可以通过补充饲料和水槽的位置来修改。但是,没有关于这种策略的信息可用于草地。因此,在15个Brahman奶牛的群体中研究了小(7500米(2))的辅助饲料和水槽的位置(7500米(2))的灌溉草地上的运动,行为和分布。牧群在旋转的五次草地上放牧,每次草地上的七天,所以每次草坪都休息了28天。有四个旋转,给出了四种治疗中的每一个重复。对于每次旋转,将下列处理之一随机分配给每个草原。补充饲料和水槽是:T1在草地的同一角落; T2分开,每个都在草原较短的侧面的中间; T3在对角线上分开; T4在相邻角分开; T5在加德中心一起。每天的每天都在每天登记每台牛的行为和位置,每2小时从9:00到15:00,7天/周,在实验持续的140天内使用瞬时扫描抽样。每个牛的总距离(即每天在每天的四个后续位置之间的欧几里德距离之间的总和)在T2和T3中比T5(分别为159.8,分别为119.5 m)。其余的治疗方法显示中间值。到最近的牛的距离在T1与T2和T3(分别为6.2 Vs 4.0和4.7 m; P = 0.007)。类似地,T1对T2的牛群归属范围更大(分别为792.6与574.7 m 2; p = 0.01)。无论治疗如何,第1天发生了社会中断,逐渐逐渐衰落到吃草的一周。结果表明,补充饲料和水槽的位置影响小(& 1公顷)的运动和牛分布。这可能在牧场和牛的动物福利设计方面具有实际应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号