首页> 外文期刊>Aquaculture North America >The Great Lakes debate: Clash or compromise
【24h】

The Great Lakes debate: Clash or compromise

机译:伟大的湖泊辩论:冲突或妥协

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

If representatives in Michigan are successful with their legislative efforts, aquaculture in the Great Lakes region will be regulated as a source of pollution, perhaps even banned. Other representatives in the Great Lakes region meanwhile want to support expansion of aquaculture development. Which will it be? Given my career in both aquaculture and environmental conservation, will I choose one side over the other? Before I answer that question, I want to examine some of the issues involved and provide some insights, from my perspective.
机译:如果密歇根州的代表都有成功的立法努力,大湖区的水产养殖将被调节为污染源,甚至禁止。 伟大的湖区其他代表同时希望支持水产养殖发展的扩张。 它会是什么? 鉴于我的水产养殖和环境保护职业生涯,我会选择一方面吗? 在我回答这个问题之前,我想从我的角度来检查所涉及的一些问题并提供一些洞察力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号