首页> 外文期刊>Animal >Effects of light-emitting diode light v. fluorescent light on growing performance, activity levels and well-being of non-beak-trimmed W-36 pullets
【24h】

Effects of light-emitting diode light v. fluorescent light on growing performance, activity levels and well-being of non-beak-trimmed W-36 pullets

机译:发光二极管光v.荧光灯荧光荧光越来越多的性能,活动水平和非喙修剪W-36毛绒的福祉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

More energy-efficient, readily dimmable, long-lasting and more affordable light-emitting diode (LED) lights are increasingly finding applications in poultry production facilities. Despite anecdotal evidence about the benefits of such lighting on bird performance and behavior, concrete research data were lacking. In this study, a commercial poultry-specific LED light (dim-to-blue, controllable correlated color temperature (CCT) from 4500 to 5300 K) and a typical compact fluorescent light (CFL) (soft white, CCT=2700 K) were compared with regards to their effects on growing performance, activity levels, and feather and comb conditions of non-beak-trimmed W-36 pullets during a 14-week rearing period. A total of 1280-day-old pullets in two successive batches, 640 birds each, were used in the study. For each batch, pullets were randomly assigned to four identical litter-floor rooms equipped with perches, two rooms per light regimen, 160 birds per room. Body weight, BW uniformity (BWU), BW gain (BWG) and cumulative mortality rate (CMR) of the pullets were determined every 2 weeks from day-old to 14 weeks of age (WOA). Activity levels of the pullets at 5 to 14 WOA were delineated by movement index. Results revealed that pullets under the LED and CFL lights had comparable BW (1140±5 g v. 1135±5 g, P=0.41), BWU (90.8±1.0% v. 91.9±1.0%, P=0.48) and CMR (1.3±0.6% v. 2.7±0.6%, P=0.18) at 14 WOA despite some varying BWG during the rearing. Circadian activity levels of the pullets were higher under the LED light than under the CFL light, possibly resulting from differences in spectrum and/or perceived light intensity between the two lights. No feather damage or comb wound was apparent in either light regimen at the end of the rearing period. The results contribute to understanding the impact of emerging LED lights on pullets rearing which is a critical component of egg production.
机译:更节能,易于可调光,持久,更实惠的发光二极管(LED)灯越来越多地发现家禽生产设施中的应用。尽管有关这种照明对鸟类绩效和行为的益处的轶事证据,但缺乏具体的研究数据。在本研究中,特定于商业家禽特异性LED光(差异为4500至5300 k)和典型的紧凑型荧光灯(CFL)(柔软的白色,CCT = 2700k)与其对14周的饲养期间,对它们对生长性能,活动水平和羽毛和非喙修剪的W-36垫圈的梳理条件的影响相比。在两个连续批次中共有1280天的母垫,每次640只鸟类都在研究中使用。对于每批批次,拔管被随机分配到配备栖息的四间相同的垃圾楼层房间,每位灯节方案的两个房间,每间客房160只鸟类。体重,BW均匀性(BWU),BW增益(BWG)和卷尺的每2周从年龄龄(WOA)的每2周确定每2周确定。 5至14 WOA的瓶子的活性水平被移动指数描绘。结果表明,LED和CFL灯下的拉管具有可比的BW(1140±5g v,p = 0.41),Bwu(90.8±1.0%v.91.9±1.0%,p = 0.48)和CMR(尽管在饲养期间,1.3±0.6%,P = 0.18)在14 WOA时,尽管有一些不同的BWG。在LED光线下牵引的昼夜活动水平比CFL光线下方更高,可能是由两盏灯之间的光谱和/或感知光强度的差异导致。在饲养期结束时,在亮度方案中没有羽毛损伤或梳子伤口显而易见。结果有助于了解新出现的LED灯对瓶子捕获的影响,这是鸡蛋生产的关键组成部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号