...
首页> 外文期刊>Animal >Indirect genetic effect model using feeding behaviour traits to define the degree of interaction between mates: an implementation in pigs growth rate
【24h】

Indirect genetic effect model using feeding behaviour traits to define the degree of interaction between mates: an implementation in pigs growth rate

机译:间接遗传效果模型使用饲养行为性状定义配对之间的相互作用程度:猪生长速率的实施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

An alternative implementation of the animal model including indirect genetic effect (IGE) is presented considering pair-mate-specific interaction degrees to improve the performance of the model. Data consisted of average daily gain (ADG) records from 663 pigs kept in groups of 10 to 14 mates during the fattening period. Three types of models were used to fit ADG data: (i) animal model (AM); (ii) AM with classical IGE (AM-IGE); and (iii) AM fitting IGE with a specific degree of interaction between each pair of mates (AM-IGE(i)). Several feeding behavior phenotypes were used to define the pair-mate-specific degree of interaction in AM-IGE(i): feeding rate (g/min), feeding frequency (min/day), the time between consecutive visits to the feeder (min/day), occupation time (min/day) and an index considering all these variables. All models included systematic effects batch, initial age (covariate), final age (covariate), number of pigs per pen (covariate), plus the random effect of the pen. Estimated posterior mean (posterior SD) of heritability was 0.47 (0.15) using AM. Including social genetic effects in the model, total heritable variance expressed as a proportion of total phenotypic variance (T-2) was 0.54 (0.29) using AM-IGE, whereas it ranged from 0.51 to 0.55 (0.12 to 0.14) with AM-IGE(i), depending on the behavior trait used to define social interactions. These results confirm the contribution of IGEs to the total heritable variation of ADG. Moreover, important differences between models were observed in EBV rankings. The percentage of coincidence of top 10% animals between AM and AM-IGE(i) ranged from 0.44 to 0.89 and from 0.41to 0.68 between AM-IGE and AM-IGE(i). Based on the goodness of fit and predictive ability, social models are preferred for the genetic evaluation of ADG. Among models including IGEs, when the pair-specific degree of interaction was defined using feeding behavior phenotypes we obtained an increase in the accuracy of genetic parameters estimates, the better goodness of fit and higher predictive ability. We conclude that feeding behavior variables can be used to measure the interaction between pen mates and to improve the performance of models including IGEs.
机译:考虑到一对配合特异性相互作用度以提高模型的性能,提出了包括间接遗传效应(IgE)的动物模型的替代实施,以改善模型的性能。由663只猪的平均每日收益(ADG)记录组成的数据包括在育肥期间以10至14个伴侣组成。三种模型用于适合ADG数据:(i)动物模型(AM); (ii)与古典IgE(AM-IgE)为单位; (iii)在每对配合(Am-IgE(I))之间具有特异性相互作用的拟合IgE。几种饲养行为表型用于定义AM-IgE(i)的对特异性特异性相互作用:进料速率(g / min),喂料频率(min / day),连续访问馈线( Min / Day),占用时间(最小/天)和考虑所有这些变量的索引。所有型号都包括系统效果批次,初始年龄(协变量),最终年龄(协变量),每支笔的猪数(协变量),加上笔的随机效果。遗传性的估计后平均值(后部SD)使用AM为0.47(0.15)。包括在模型中的社会遗传效果,使用AM-IgE的总表型方差(T-2)的比例表达的总遗传方差为0.54(0.29),而AM-IgE在0.51至0.55(0.12至0.14)。 (i),取决于用于定义社交互动的行为特征。这些结果证实了IGES对ADG的总遗传变异的贡献。此外,在EBV排名中观察到模型之间的重要差异。 AM和AM-IGE(I)之间的前10%动物的偏执率的百分比范围为0.44至0.89,在AM-IgE和Am-IgE(I)之间的0.41至0.68。基于适应性和预测能力的良好,社会模型对于ADG的遗传评估是优选的。在包括IGES的模型中,当使用喂养行为表型定义对特异性相互作用程度,我们获得了遗传参数估计的准确性的提高,良好的良好良好和更高的预测能力。我们得出结论,喂养行为变量可用于测量笔配合之间的相互作用,并改善包括IGES的模型的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号