首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Sports Medicine >Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation With and Without Concomitant Meniscus Allograft Transplantation: A Comparative Matched Group Analysis
【24h】

Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation With and Without Concomitant Meniscus Allograft Transplantation: A Comparative Matched Group Analysis

机译:骨质色素同种异体移植的结果,无伴随弯月球同种异体移植:比较匹配组分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) is often performed with concomitant meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT) as a strategy for knee joint preservation, although to date, the effect of concomitant MAT on outcomes and failure rates after OCA has not been assessed. Purpose: To determine clinical outcomes for patients undergoing OCA with MAT as compared with a matched cohort of patients undergoing isolated OCA. Study Design: Control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent OCA of the medial or lateral femoral condyle without concomitant MAT by a single surgeon were compared with a matched group of patients who underwent OCA with concomitant MAT (ipsilateral compartment). The patients were matched per age, sex, body mass index, and number of previous ipsilateral knee operations ±1. Patient-reported outcomes, complications, reoperations, and survival rates were compared between groups. Results: One hundred patients undergoing OCA (50 isolated, 50 with MAT) with a mean ± SD follow-up of 4.9 ± 2.7 years (minimum, 2 years) were included (age, 31.7 ± 9.8 years; 52% male). Significantly more patients underwent OCA to the medial femoral condyle (n = 59) than the lateral femoral condyle (n = 41, P P = .834), time to reoperation (2.2 ± 2.4 years for OCA with MAT, 3.4 ± 2.7 years for OCA without MAT, P = .149), or failure rates (n = 7 [14%] for OCA with MAT, n = 7 [14%] for OCA without MAT, P > .999). There were no significant differences in patient-reported clinical outcome scores between the groups at final follow-up. There was no significant difference in failure rates between patients undergoing medial femoral condyle OCA (n = 12, 15.3%) and lateral femoral condyle OCA (n = 5, 12.2%, P = .665). Conclusion: These results imply that with appropriate surgical indications to address meniscus deficiency in patients otherwise indicated for OCA and despite the added surgical time and complexity of concomitant MAT, outcomes are favorable, with an 86% OCA graft survivorship at 5 years. This information can be used to counsel patients undergoing OCA with concomitant MAT as part of a knee joint preservation strategy.
机译:背景:骨质色素同种异体移植移植(OCA)通常用伴随的弯月面同种异体移植移植(MAT)作为膝关节保存的策略,尽管迄今为止,尚未评估OCA后伴随垫和OCA之后的失效率的效果。目的:与垫子相比,测定垫子接受OCA的患者的临床结果,与接受孤立的oca的匹配群体相比。研究设计:对照研究;证据水平,3.方法:与单个外科医生没有伴随垫子而没有伴随垫子的内侧或外侧股骨髁的患者的患者与伴随席子(同侧隔室)进行了匹配的患者。患者均为每龄龄,性别,体重指数和先前的同侧膝关节操作±1的数量。在组之间比较了患者报告的结果,并发症,重新进展和生存率。结果:含有4.9±2.7岁的平均±SD随访4.9±2.7岁(50岁)的OCA(50分离,50分离,50例)(年龄,31.7±9.8岁; 52%的男性)。更大的患者接受了内侧股骨髁(n = 59)的患者比横向股骨髁(n = 41,pp = .834),重新进入时间(22±2.4岁,与垫子的OCA,3.4±2.7岁)OCA没有垫,P = .149),或用垫的OCA的失败率(n = 7 [14%],N = 7 [14%]对于没有垫的OCA,P>。999)。在最终随访中,患者报告患者报告的临床结果分数没有显着差异。经历内侧股骨髁OCA(n = 12,15.3%)和外侧股骨髁OCA(n = 5,12.2%,p = .665)没有显着差异。结论:这些结果暗示,在适当的外科手术指示以解决OCA否则表明患者的夜总会缺乏,尽管伴随席位的额外手术时间和复杂性,但结果是有利的,86%的OCA移植物生存率为5年。该信息可用于咨询OCA的患者,伴随席位作为膝关节保存策略的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号