首页> 外文期刊>Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology: the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc >Chest‐lead ST‐J amplitudes using arm electrodes as reference instead of the Wilson central terminal in smartphone ECG applications: Influence on ST‐elevation myocardial infarction criteria fulfillment
【24h】

Chest‐lead ST‐J amplitudes using arm electrodes as reference instead of the Wilson central terminal in smartphone ECG applications: Influence on ST‐elevation myocardial infarction criteria fulfillment

机译:使用ARM电极作为参考的胸部引线ST-J幅度代替智能手机ECG应用中的Wilson Central终端:对ST升高心肌梗死标准实现的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background “Smartphone 12‐lead ECG” for the assessment of acute myocardial ischemia has recently been introduced. In the smartphone 12‐lead ECG either the right or the left arm can be used as reference for the chest electrodes instead of the Wilson central terminal. These leads are labeled “CR leads” or “CL leads.” We aimed to compare chest‐lead ST‐J amplitudes, using either CR or CL leads, to those present in the conventional 12‐lead ECG, and to determine sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of STEMI for CR and CL leads. Methods Five hundred patients (74 patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 66 patients with nonischemic ST deviation and 360 controls) were included. Smartphone 12‐lead ECG chest‐lead ST‐J amplitudes were calculated for both CR and CL leads. Results ST‐J amplitudes were 9.1?±?29?μV larger for CR leads and 7.7?±?42?μV larger for CL leads than for conventional chest leads (V leads). Sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 95% for CR leads and 81% and 97% for CL leads when fulfillment of STEMI criteria in V leads was used as reference. In ischemic patients who met STEMI criteria in V leads, but not in limb leads, STEMI criteria were met with CR or CL leads in 91%. Conclusion By the use of CR or CL leads, smartphone 12‐lead ECG results in slightly lower sensitivity in STEMI detection. Therefore, the adjustment of STEMI criteria may be needed before application in clinical practice.
机译:最近介绍了用于评估急性心肌缺血的“智能手机12-Lead ECG”。在智能手机12-引线ECG右侧或左臂可以用作胸部电极的参考而不是威尔逊中心终端。这些引线标记为“CR引导”或“CL引导”。我们的目标是使用Cr或Cl导致的胸部引导ST-J振幅与传统的12-铅ECG中存在的那些进行比较,并确定Cr和Cl引导诊断症的敏感性和特异性。方法包括五百名患者(74例患有ST升高的心肌梗死(STEMI),66例无缺陷ST偏差和360次)。智能手机12引导ECG胸部引线ST-J幅度用于CR和CL引导。结果ST-J幅度为CR引线的9.1〜29Ω·μV,对于CL引线而言,CR引线的7.7°±42.μV更大。敏感性和特异性为CR引线的94%和95%,CL导致81%和97%,当v铅中的STEMI标准达到vIems时,得到了参考。在缺血患者中,在VIEX中满足STEMI标准,但不在肢体引线中,通过CR或CL引入91%满足Stemi标准。结论通过使用CR或CL引导,智能手机12-铅ECG导致Stemi检测略微较低。因此,在临床实践中施用之前可能需要调整STEMI标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号