...
首页> 外文期刊>Animal Production Science >Revised greenhouse-gas emissions from Australian dairy farms following application of updated methodology
【24h】

Revised greenhouse-gas emissions from Australian dairy farms following application of updated methodology

机译:在应用更新的方法后,修改了澳大利亚乳制品农场的温室气体排放量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Every year since 1990, the Australian Federal Government has estimated national greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions to meet Australia's reporting commitments under the United National Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The National Greenhouse Gas Inventory (NGGI) methodology used to estimate Australia's GHG emissions has altered over time, as new research data have been used to improve the inventory emission factors and algorithms, with the latest change occurring in 2015 for the 2013 reporting year. As measuring the GHG emissions on farm is expensive and time-consuming, the dairy industry is reliant on estimating emissions using tools such as the Australian Dairy Carbon Calculator (ADCC). The present study compared the emission profiles of 41 Australian dairy farms with ADCC using the old (pre-2015) and new (post-2015) NGGI methodologies to examine the impact of the changes on the emission intensity across a range of dairy-farm systems. The estimated mean (+/- s.d.) GHG emission intensity increased by 3.0%, to 1.07 (+/- 0.02) kg of carbon dioxide equivalents per kilogram of fat-and-protein-corrected milk (kgCO(2)e/kg FPCM). When comparing the emission intensity between the old and new NGGI methodologies at a regional level, the change in emission intensity varied between a 4.6% decrease and 10.4% increase, depending on the region. When comparing the source of emissions between old and new NGGI methodologies across the whole dataset, methane emissions from enteric fermentation and waste management both increased, while nitrous oxide emissions from waste management and nitrogen fertiliser management, CO2 emissions from energy consumption and pre-farm gate (supplementary feed and fertilisers) emissions all declined. Enteric methane remains a high source of emissions and so will remain a focus for mitigation research. However, these changes to the NGGI methodology have highlighted a new 'hotspot' in methane from manure management. Researchers and farm managers will have greater need to identify and implement practices on-farm to reduce methane losses to the environment.
机译:自1990年以来每年,澳大利亚联邦政府估计全国温室 - 天然气(GHG)排放,以满足澳大利亚根据“联合国气候变化框架公约”(UNFCCC)的报告承诺。估计澳大利亚的G温室气体排放的国家温室气体库存(NGGI)方法随着时间的推移而改变,因为新的研究数据已被用来改善库存排放因子和算法,2013年2013年报告年度发生的最新变革。由于衡量农场上的温室气体排放昂贵且耗时,乳制品行业依赖澳大利亚乳制品碳计算器(ADCC)等工具估算排放。本研究将41澳大利亚乳制品农场的排放概况与ADCC使用旧的(2015年)和新(2015年后)NGGI方法,以研究各种乳制品农场系统中排放强度的影响。估计平均值(+/- SD)温度发射强度增加了3.0%,至1.07(+/- 0.02)千克二氧化碳当量每千克脂肪蛋白矫正牛奶(KGCO(2)E / kg FPCM )。在区域一级比较旧和新的NGGI方法之间的发射强度时,减少强度的变化在4.6%的下降之间变化,增加10.4%,这取决于该地区。在整个数据集中旧的NGGI方法之间的排放源,肠道发酵和废物管理中的甲烷排放量增加,而废物管理和氮肥管理的一氮氧化物排放,来自能源消耗和农业前的二氧化碳排放量(补充饲料和肥料)排放都拒绝。肠溶甲烷仍然是排放源的高来源,因此仍将重点缓解研究。然而,这些对NGGI方法的变化突出了粪便管理中的新的“热点”。研究人员和农场管理人员将更需要识别和实施农场的实践,以减少对环境的甲烷损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号