首页> 外文期刊>Annals of hematology >Comparison of outcomes after donor lymphocyte infusion with or without prior chemotherapy for minimal residual disease in acute leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
【24h】

Comparison of outcomes after donor lymphocyte infusion with or without prior chemotherapy for minimal residual disease in acute leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

机译:在同种异体造血干细胞移植后,在急性白血病/髓细胞增生症中的急性白血病/骨髓增生综合征中的最小化疗后的促进剂淋巴细胞输注后的结果比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The efficacy of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) without chemotherapy was investigated and compared with that of chemotherapy prior to DLI (Chemo-DLI) in patients who were minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We enrolled 115 consecutive patients who received either DLI (n = 20) or Chemo-DLI (n = 95) during the same period. For each DLI recipient, three recipients matched for age at the HSCT, underlying diseases, and the year of the HSCT were randomly selected from the Chemo-DLI cohort (n = 60). The 2-year cumulative incidence of severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD was comparable between the groups. Fifteen (75.0%) and 47 (78.3%) patients in the DLI and Chemo-DLI groups turned MRD-negative, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality after intervention were 30.7 versus 39.6% (P = 0.582) and 10.3 versus 6.0% (P = 0.508) in the DLI and Chemo-DLI groups, respectively. The 2-year probabilities of disease-free, overall, and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival after preemptive intervention were 58.9 versus 54.3% (P = 0.862), 69.3 versus 78.1% (P = 0.361), and 44.4 versus 35.1% (P = 0.489) in the DLI and Chemo-DLI groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the intervention method did not significantly influence the clinical outcomes. In summary, preemptive DLI alone may be effective for patients who are MRD-positive and may be a potential alternative for patients who refuse or are unable to receive Chemo-DLI after HSCT.
机译:研究了没有化疗的供体淋巴细胞输注(DLI)的疗效,并与DLI(Chemo-DLI)中的化疗相比,在异种造血干细胞移植(HSCT)之后是最小的残留疾病(MRD) - 阳性的患者。我们在同一时期内注册了115名接受DLI(n = 20)或Chemo-DLI(n = 95)的患者。对于每种DLI受体,从Chemo-DLI队列(n = 60)中随机选择患有HSCT,潜在疾病的年龄和HSCT的年龄的三个接受者。两年的严重急性移植物与宿主疾病(GVHD)和慢性GVHD之间的累积发病率相当。 DLI和Chemo-DLI组中的十五个(75.0%)和47名(78.3%)分别转动了MRD阴性。干预后的2年复发和非复发死亡率分别在DLI和化学-DLI组中分别为30.7与39.6%(p = 0.582)和10.3与6.0%(p = 0.508)。先发制干预后的无疾病,总体和GVHD /复发存活的2年概率为58.9,而54.3%(p = 0.862),69.3与78.1%(p = 0.361),44.4与35.1% (P = 0.489)分别在DLI和Chemo-DLI组中。在多变量分析中,干预方法没有显着影响临床结果。总之,仅用于MRD阳性的患者的先发型DLI可能对患者进行潜在的替代品,拒绝在HSCT后无法接受化学-DLI的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号