...
首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesiology research and practice >A Comparative Study of 0.25% Levobupivacaine, 0.25% Ropivacaine, and 0.25% Bupivacaine in Paediatric Single Shot Caudal Block
【24h】

A Comparative Study of 0.25% Levobupivacaine, 0.25% Ropivacaine, and 0.25% Bupivacaine in Paediatric Single Shot Caudal Block

机译:0.25%Levobupivacaine,0.25%Ropivacaine,0.25%Bupivacaine在儿科单次射击尾部尾部的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Aim. There are limited data comparing levobupivacaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine in paediatric patients. So, this study was performed to evaluate the caudal effectiveness of all the three drugs in paediatric patients undergoing infraumbilical surgeries and associated complications with these drugs. Material and Methods. 90 patients of ASA grade I and II posted for elective infraumbilical surgeries were randomly divided into three groups of 30 each. A standardized anaesthetic protocol was used. Patients received 0.25% levobupivacaine in group 1, 0.25% ropivacaine in group 2, and 0.25% bupivacaine in group 3. The effectiveness of block was assessed using caudal effectiveness score. Postoperative pain relief was assessed with modified Hannallah pain score. Haemodynamic parameter monitoring was done. The duration of analgesia and associated complications were studied. Statistical analysis was done using the chi-square test for nonparametric data. Parametric data were analysed using ANOVA for intergroup comparison and Tukey’s HSD for intragroup comparison. Results. Demographic data were comparable. Haemodynamic parameters remained within normal range. Mean caudal effectiveness score in all the three groups was statistically insignificant (p>0.05). The duration of analgesia provided by bupivacaine (145.31 ± 26.17?min) was longer than levobupivacaine (126.15 ± 15.15?min) and ropivacaine (114.68 ± 11.32?min) (p<0.01). Mean postoperative pain scores were lower in group 3 as compared to group 1 and group 2. Conclusion. We conclude that levobupivacaine and ropivacaine provide similar intraoperative quality with minimal haemodynamic variability and shorter duration of postoperative analgesia without any significant complications when compared with racemic bupivacaine. This trial is registered with CTRI/2018/03/012402.
机译:目的。与儿科患者中的左旋眼盖,罗哌港和布比卡因有限有限。因此,该研究进行了评估所有三种药物在接受过免疫手术和这些药物的相关并发症中的所有三种药物的尾病效性。材料与方法。 90例ASA等级和II患者张贴的选修基线手术术后随机分为30组。使用标准化麻醉方案。患者在第1组,第2组中的0.25%Ropivacaine中获得0.25%的左旋蛋白,第3组中的0.25%Bupivaine。使用尾部效果评分评估嵌段的有效性。通过修改的Hannallah疼痛评分评估术后疼痛缓解。血液动力学参数监测已完成。研究了镇痛和相关并发症的持续时间。使用非参数数据的Chi-Square测试完成统计分析。使用ANOVA进行参数数据进行分析用于Interagrous比较和Tukey的HSD用于Intragroup比较。结果。人口统计数据是可比的。血液动力学参数仍然在正常范围内。意味着所有三组的尾部有效性得分在统计学上微不足道(P> 0.05)。由Bupivacaine提供的镇痛持续时间(145.31±26.17?min)比左峰(126.15±15.15〜min)和Ropivacaine(114.68±11.32?min)(P <0.01)。与第1组和第2组相比,第3组平均术后疼痛评分较低。结论。我们得出结论,Levobupivacaine和Ropivacaine提供了类似的术中质量,其血液动力学可变性和术后镇痛较短的持续时间较短,而与外消旋Bupivacaine相比,没有任何显着的并发症。此试验在CTRI / 2018/03 / 012402注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号