...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Water Management >Maize (Zea mays L.) physiological responses to drought and rewatering, and the associations with water stress degree
【24h】

Maize (Zea mays L.) physiological responses to drought and rewatering, and the associations with water stress degree

机译:玉米(Zea mays L.)生理反应对干旱和再水中,以及与水胁迫度的关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A thorough understanding of the plant drought response mechanism and the relationships between plant functional traits and drought will help to improve the key biophysical process parameterization scheme in ecological and crop growth models. In this study, a drought level evaluation indicator, named water stress degree (D-ws), was established by synthetically considering soil water content (WC), evapotranspiration, and drought duration to obtain a quantitative description of drought level. The maize physiological and functional traits responses to drought and subsequent rewatering were also investigated. Drought-rewatering field experiments with no water addition for 40 days during the vegetative period (VP) and reproductive period (RP) were respectively conducted at Jinzhou Agrometerological Experimental Station, northeast China in 2014 and 2016. The D-ws values indicated that there were significant differences between growth stages and between years because the environmental conditions in 2014 and 2016 were different during the maize growth periods. Furthermore, D-ws was larger in 2016 than in 2014 during the VP and RP. Leaf photosynthesis had a certain adaptability to drought, and the transpiration rate (E) drought response (DR) was quicker than the photosynthetic rate (Pn) response, and P-n recovery was greater than E recovery when the plants were rewatered during the VP. However, leaf photosynthesis is more sensitive to drought and less available to recover as normal in subsequent rewatering during the RP than the VP, which was intensified as D-ws rose between 2014 and 2016. In addition, the leaf WC drought response was faster than the photosynthetic DR during the VP and RP, and leaf and stalk WCs responded more rapidly to drought during the VP than the RP. The decrease in ear WC during the earlier grouting period was larger in the VP than in the RP treatment. However, the drought-induced decrease in daily sap flow rate (DSF) during the RP was larger than during the VP, while the differences in DSF drought response and DSF recovery during rewatering were attributed to the inter-annual variation in Dws. Furthermore, the drought-caused reductions in leaf, stalk, and plant total dry matters and in leaf and stalk WCs had positively exponential or linear relationships with D-ws. The results can help to understand the disaster-causing mechanism of drought-stricken maize.
机译:彻底了解植物干旱反应机制和植物功能性状和干旱之间的关系将有助于改善生态和作物生长模型中的关键生物物理过程参数化方案。在本研究中,通过合成土壤含水量(WC),蒸发剂和干旱持续时间来确定通过合成土壤含水量(WC),蒸发和干旱持续时间来建立旱性水平评估指标,命名为水胁迫度(D-WS),以获得干旱水平的定量描述。还调查了玉米生理和功能性状对干旱和随后的再次进行的反应。在营养期间(vp)和生殖期间(vp)和生殖期间(rp)期间没有水另外的干旱再次田间实验分别于2014年和2016年东北地区进行锦州农学学实验站进行。D-WS值表明存在增长阶段与年间之间的显着差异,因为2014年和2016年的环境条件在玉米生长期内不同。此外,2016年D-WS比2014年更大,而不是2014年,在VP和RP期间。叶片光合作用对干旱有一定的适应性,蒸腾率(e)干旱响应(DR)比光合速率(PN)反应更快,并且当植物在VP期间重新水中重新水时,P-N恢复大于E恢复。然而,叶片光合作用对干旱更敏感,并且在RP期间随后的再次水浸在随后的vp中恢复较低,这在2014年至2016年之间被加强。此外,叶WC干旱反应速度比在VP和RP期间的光合作用DR,以及叶片和茎WCS比RP在VP期间对干旱更快地响应。在早期灌浆期间的耳朵WC减少在VP中比RP处理更大。然而,在RP期间的日常SAP流速(DSF)的干旱诱导的降低大于VP期间,而再水中的DSF干旱反应和DSF恢复的差异归因于DWS的年间变异。此外,叶片,茎秆和植物总干燥和叶片和茎和茎WC的干旱导致的减少与D-WS具有正面的指数或线性关系。结果有助于了解干旱灾害玉米的造成灾害机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号