...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Water Management >Assessing low-pressure solid-set sprinkler irrigation in maize
【24h】

Assessing low-pressure solid-set sprinkler irrigation in maize

机译:评估玉米的低压固体喷水灭火灌溉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Water and energy are limited and expensive resources. Conserving water and energy is a requirement to ensure the viability of modern pressurized irrigation systems. The objective of this research was to analyze the possibilities of reducing the nozzle operating pressure of impact sprinklers from 300 kPa (standard pressure) to 200 kPa (low pressure) in solid-set irrigation systems without reducing the sprinkler spacing and maintaining crop yield. Three treatments resulting from combinations of sprinkler type, and working pressure were analyzed: 1) Conventional impact sprinkler operating at 300 kPa (CIS300); 2) Conventional impact sprinkler operating at 200 kPa (CIS200); and 3) Modified deflecting plate impact sprinkler operating at 200 kPa (DPIS200). A randomized experimental design was applied to a maize crop during two seasons (2015 and 2016). Irrigation performance was measured by catch-can monitoring at one replicate of each treatment. Maize growth, yield and its components were measured. Differences between treatments in soil water, maize growth and yield variables were analyzed using ANOVA. Seasonal irrigation uniformity evaluated at the top of the canopy was larger for the standard pressure treatment (93%) than for the low pressure treatments (82% and 84% for DPIS200 and CIS200, respectively). The average wind drift and evaporation losses for the 2016 irrigation season were higher for the CIS300 treatment (17%) than for the low pressure treatments, DPIS200 (15%) and CIS200 (13%). Low pressure treatments did not reduce grain yield compared with the standard pressure treatment. Differences in irrigation performance and maize yield between the low pressure treatments, DPIS200 and CIS200, were not statistically significant. The reduction in energy use by reducing the operating pressure from 300 kPa to 200 kPa would allow to increase the net farming benefit of individual and collective systems. This is particularly true if low pressure irrigation is considered at the design phase of the irrigation system. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:水和能源有限,资源昂贵。保守水和能量是确保现代加压灌溉系统的可行性的要求。本研究的目的是分析固体灌溉系统中从300kPa(标准压力)到200kPa(低压)在固体设定的灌溉系统中将喷嘴运行压力降低的可能性,而不会降低喷洒间隔和维持作物产量。分析了喷洒型和工作压力组合产生的三种处理:1)在300kPa(CIS300)下运行的常规冲击喷水隆。 2)在200kPa(CIS200)中运行的常规冲击喷水器; 3)改性偏转板冲击喷水灭火器在200kPa(DPIS200)上运行。在两个季节(2015年和2016年)期间,将随机实验设计应用于玉米作物。通过捕获性能​​测量灌溉性能在每种治疗的一次重复中测量。测量玉米生长,产量及其组分。利用ANOVA分析了土壤水中治疗方法的差异,玉米生长和产量变量。标准压力处理(93%)比低压处理(分别为DPIS200和CIS200的82%和84%),在冠层顶部评估的季节性灌溉均匀性更大。 2016次灌溉季节的平均风漂流和蒸发损失较高,适用于CIS300治疗(17%),而不是低压处理,DPIS200(15%)和CIS200(13%)。与标准压力处理相比,低压处理不会降低籽粒产量。低压处理,DPIS200和CIS200之间的灌溉性能和玉米产量的差异在统计学上没有统计学意义。通过从300 kPa到200 kPa降低工作压力的能量使用的减少将允许增加个人和集体系统的净养殖利益。如果在灌溉系统的设计阶段考虑低压灌溉,则尤其如此。 (c)2017 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号