首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Systems >Herbicide free agriculture? A bio-economic modelling application to Swiss wheat production
【24h】

Herbicide free agriculture? A bio-economic modelling application to Swiss wheat production

机译:除草剂免费农业? 瑞士小麦生产的生物经济型号应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Herbicide application in agricultural systems is currently critically discussed because of its possible adverse effects on the environment and human health. Currently, governments and food industry actors search for solutions to reduce herbicide use on farms. Yet, potential consequences of herbicide reductions on a farm-level are not well known. The goal of this article is to develop and apply a bio-economic modelling approach to simulate how farmers and agricultural systems react to a potential ban of glyphosate and eventually of all herbicides. We apply this approach for Swiss Extenso wheat production, which is a widespread form of wheat production in Switzerland, where pesticide use is currently limited to herbicides and seed treatments. Our modelling approach combines spatially explicit, detailed information on weed pressure, possible yield effects of weeds and efficacy and costs of 140 weed control strategies in a spatially explicit economic decision model. We assess the strategies optimal for farmers in response to i) glyphosate-free and ii) herbicide-free production requirements in terms of economic losses, yield reductions and environmental impacts. We find economic losses in the glyphosate-free production scenario of up to CHF 119/ha and in the herbicide-free scenario of up to CHF 192/ha, with respective yield reductions ranging between 0.8 and 2.7 dt/ha (i.e. of up to 6%). However, possible economic losses would be outweighed by existing Swiss agri-environmental direct payments for herbicide-free and reduced tillage production systems. We find that restrictions with respect to glyphosate and herbicide use imply trade-offs between the reduction in pesticide risks for the environment and human health versus higher energy consumption. Yet, these trade-offs can be limited if incentive schemes for glyphosate and herbicide reduction are combined with requirements to prevent more intensive tillage.
机译:由于其对环境和人类健康可能的不利影响,农业系统中的除草剂应用目前严重讨论。目前,政府和食品行业参与者寻求解决农场除草剂的解决方案。然而,除草剂减少对农业水平的潜在后果并不众所周知。本文的目标是制定和应用生物经济建模方法,以模拟农民和农业系统如何对草甘膦的潜在禁令以及最终的所有除草剂反应。我们为瑞士专利小麦生产采用这种方法,这是瑞士普通的小麦产量,其中农药目前仅限于除草剂和种子处理。我们的建模方法结合了空间明确的有关杂草压力的详细信息,在空间明确的经济决策模型中可能的杂草压力,可能的杂草和功效以及140次杂草控制策略的成本。我们评估对农民最佳的策略响应于i)免疫酸盐和II)在经济损失,产量减少和环境影响方面采用除草剂的生产要求。我们在直到CHF 119 /公顷的免疫性生产场景中发现了经济损失,并在不超过192 /公顷的除草剂场景,各自的产量减少在0.8和2.7 dt / ha之间(即最多) 6%)。然而,现有的瑞士农业环境直接支付可能的经济损失将超过除草剂和耕作生产系统的恒生。我们发现关于草甘膦和除草剂的限制使用意味着环境和人类健康的农药风险减少与更高能耗之间的权衡。然而,如果草甘膦和除草剂减少的激励方案与要求防止更加强化耕种的要求,这些权衡可以限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号