...
首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesiology >Nebulization of Antiinfective Agents in Invasively Mechanically Ventilated Adults A Systematic Review and Meta-anaiysis
【24h】

Nebulization of Antiinfective Agents in Invasively Mechanically Ventilated Adults A Systematic Review and Meta-anaiysis

机译:在侵入式机械通风的成年人中抗射精剂的雾化是系统评价和Meta-Anysis

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Nebulization of antiinfective agents is a common but unstandardized practice in critically ill patients. Methods: A systematic review of 1,435 studies was performed in adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. Two different administration strategies (adjunctive and substitute) were considered clinically relevant. Inclusion was restricted to studies using jet, ultrasonic, and vibrating-mesh nebulizers. Studies involving children, colonized-but-not-infected adults, and cystic fibrosis patients were excluded. Results: Five of the 11 studies included had a small sample size (fewer than 50 patients), and only 6 were randomized. Diversity of case-mix, dosage, and devices are sources of bias. Only a few patients had severe hypoxemia. Aminoglycosides and colistin were the most common antibiotics, being safe regarding nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity, but increased respiratory complications in 9% (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.18; I~2= 52%), particularly when administered to hypoxemic patients. For tracheobronchitis, a significant decrease in emergence of resistance was evidenced (risk ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.64; I~2 = 0%). Similar findings were observed in pneumonia by susceptible pathogens, without improvement in mortality or ventilation duration. In pneumonia caused by resistant pathogens, higher clinical resolution (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.96; I~2 = 0%) was evidenced. These findings were not consistently evidenced in the assessment of efficacy against pneumonia caused by susceptible pathogens. Conclusions: Performance of randomized trials evaluating the impact of nebulized antibiotics with more homogeneous populations, standardized drug delivery, predetermined clinical efficacy, and safety outcomes is urgently required. Infections by resistant pathogens might potentially have higher benefit from nebulized antiinfective agents. Nebulization, without concomitant systemic administration of the drug, may reduce nephrotoxicity but may also be associated with higher risk of respiratory complications.
机译:背景:抗抗射精剂的雾化是危重病患者的常见而非明确的实践。方法:在接受侵入式机械通气的成人中进行1,435项研究的系统审查。两种不同的管理策略(辅助和替代品)被认为是临床相关的。夹杂物仅限于采用喷射,超声波和振动网发动机的研究。涉及儿童,殖民化但未感染的成年人和囊性纤维化患者的研究被排除在外。结果:包含的11项研究中有五项样品尺寸(少于50名患者),只有6种随机化。壳体混合,剂量和装置的多样性是偏差的来源。只有少数患者患有严重的低氧血症。氨基糖苷和乳霉素是最常见的抗生素,对肾毒性和神经毒性安全,但在9%(95%CI,0.01至0.18; I〜2 = 52%)中增加了呼吸并发症,特别是当给予缺氧患者时。对于气管赤骨炎,显着降低了抗性的显着降低(风险比,0.18; 95%CI,0.05至0.64; I〜2 = 0%)。通过易感病原体在肺炎中观察到类似的发现,而不会改善死亡率或通风持续时间。在肺炎引起的抗性病原体,临床分辨率较高(差距,1.96; 95%CI,1.30至2.96; I〜2 = 0%)。这些发现在评估对易感病原体引起的肺炎的疗效评估中并不一致。结论:随机试验的性能评估雾化抗生素对更均匀群体的影响,迫切需要标准化药物递送,预定的临床疗效和安全结果。抗性病原体的感染可能从雾化的抗射精剂中具有更高的益处。无伴随的药物施用药物的雾化可能会减少肾毒性,但也可能与呼吸复杂性的风险较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号